View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old April 4th, 2005, 04:28 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
T. A. Gardner T. A. Gardner is online now
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,718
Salute!: 3
Saluted 62 Times in 43 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of light
Post

It is interesting to note that parachute units were least successful in the assault role (Crete, Holland (twice...1940 then Market-Garden), even Normandy to a good degree. They were most successful in taking and holding ground in advance of ground troops (sort of very mobile infantry). They also had success in smaller special operations like Eben Emael and Bruneval.
When used as reinforcements by air, Sicily and Salerno for example, they were really just an expensive waste of effort.
So, what changes could the various nations that used paratroops have done to make them more effective operationally and tactically?
Reply With Quote