Thread: Allied Bombers
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old March 31st, 2004, 08:32 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Martin BullOKF Moderator Martin Bull is offline
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,890
Salute!: 71
Saluted 184 Times in 100 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
You may be 'putting the cart before the horse'...the B-29 was designed as an eventual replacement for both the B-17 and B-24, using lessons learned from operational use of those aircraft.

The first B-29 didn't fly until late 1942 and the decision was taken to initially use this type against Japan due to the very long range flights involved. Type development, or ironing out the bugs, always takes a lot of time ( as happened with the Me 262 ) so in war it's often a case of making the best of what you've got.

It's an interesting 'what if?' though - if things had happened quicker, picture swarms of rocket-equipped Me 262s hacking into massed formations of Superforts at high altitude...
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote