|
I don't think so
The strategic position of the Kriegsmarine was pretty poor to start with. What would they have done with these ships? The Kriegsmarine, although more competent than their Italian counterparts were still lacking in aggression on the surface side of things. Hitler constantly meddled with them, limiting their initiative and having a generally baleful effect of the surface fleet. This contrasts with the British who made plenty of mistakes but never had limitations placed on what sort of ships they could engage. Consequently Gloworm would happily ram Hipper, Warspite could be risked at Narvik and cruisers could be lost in abundance at Crete because Admirals knew they only had to quote Nelson at any critic and they would shut up.
This failure to trust surface Captains, I argue, dulled their sense of initiative and denied the Kriegsmarine victories and condemned them to a string of defeats.
Jumbo
__________________
"Capital! We're nearly out of ammunition! Now we can get at them with the bayonet!" General Paddy Gough, 1st Sikh War
|