View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 2nd, 2007, 04:08 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
T. A. Gardner T. A. Gardner is online now
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,377
Salute!: 0
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
T. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really nice
Default Re: The germans had an ogranized retreat in the West?

The problem for Germany in the West in 1944 isn't need of an orgainzed retreat, but the lack of mobility of virtually all but a handful of their combat units. Whether the "hold at all costs" policy is followed or not, the Germans have really only two other really bad choices:

1. Try to hold until a breakthrough is made and then reseal the line using their limited mobile forces. Failing that, withdraw as best they can. This option means the majority of the non-mobile forces are going to end up pocketed and POWs.

2. Withdraw their non-mobile forces in a timely fashion using their limited mobile forces as a rear guard to allow the withdrawal. The problem here is that the mobile forces will be ground to nothing leaving no means of offensive action for the Germans at a later date. Yes, the non-mobile divisions are intact but their combat value in many cases is very limited so you are really robbing Peter to pay Paul.

Basically, the Germans in 1944 as a complete army were so badly over-matched that they were just buying time until their eventual defeat.
Reply With Quote