Quote:
Originally Posted by 3ball44
Tikilal: The AR is far and away a funner gun to shoot than the AK. It is more accurate, has less recoil, and is not as loud. AK's can really bark, and with my height and long arms it is sometimes difficult to fit into the sights of an AK. The AK also heats up very quickly and it is easy to burn your hand on the metal near the foregrip and the barrel.
I see both of these guns as carbines, not battlerifles. I think the "richest nation in the world" made a mistake when it equiped its army with the .223. They can put the short barrels and folding and collapsable stocks on these guns, and they make them a compact little tank gun, ideal for going through houses and such. Its when we have marines out in the desert or in the mountains shooting at 400+ yards that not having a larger caliber in your squad really kills you, quite literally.
|
IMO. You mentioned one of the reasons. Shooting full auto with something like a .308 will heat the barrel quicker. You can carry more rounds with less weight with a .223.
Why would the average Marine need to shoot 400yds...with open sights anyway?