View Single Post
  #63 (permalink)  
Old August 6th, 2007, 03:01 AM
Slipdigit's Avatar
SlipdigitOKF Admin Slipdigit is online now
Good Ol' Boy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 4,470
Slipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of lightSlipdigit is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Nazi's & Western Allies Combine Forces Against Russia

Quote:
Originally Posted by john1761 View Post
Just got this info .

TABLE XXX ECONOMIC AND MILITARY USE OF THE GERMAN MALE POPULATION BY THE END OF 1944

OF WHOM IN
GROUP AGE (44) TOTAL EMPLOYED MILITARY SERVICE

70-78 66-74 2,120,000 391,000 (18.4%) -
79-83 61-65 1,612,000 1,006,000 (62.4%) -
84-93 51-60 3,900,000 3,444,000 (88%) 118,000 (3%)
94-00 44-50 3,633,000 3,437,000 (94.6%) 702,000 (19.3%)
01-05 39-43 3,351,000 3,250,000 (97%) 1,247,000 (37.2%)
06-22 22-38 10,574,000 10,439,000 (98.7%) 8,222,000 (77.8%)
23-26 19-21 2,573,000 2,480,000 (96.4%) 2,405,000 (93.5%)
27 18 597,000 547,000 (91.6%) 125,000 (20.9%)
28 17 610,000 525,000 (86.1%) -
29 16 592,000 455,000 (76.9%) -
30 15 594,000 410,000 (69%) -
The 1st #s are yr born, 2nd age in44, 3rd total pop. 4th # in idus and heers ,5th # in Heers . This shows that there were a large group of armed forces 19 to 43 yrs old in 44. Some where close to 12 million . So there would have been plenty of seasoned vets for the allies to use against the red menace in 45
Good data, John. Was this on web page?

Any of you guys have a good theory on why the percentages in the 51-60 range was so low, when the groups either side were substantially higher? Look at the 61-65 group, dang near a two-thirds of them.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW

Flag of the State of Alabama
Reply With Quote