View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old September 21st, 2007, 04:37 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
PzJgr PzJgr is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,454
Salute!: 1
Saluted 9 Times in 7 Posts
PzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nicePzJgr is just really nice
Default Re: No Pacific Fleet

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mussolini View Post
Hmmm...I still think Japan would have attacked US bases in the Pacific. They would have realized that the US would have jumped into the war at some point. Instead of a Pearl-Harbor Raid, I imagine they would have landed troops at Midway and Pearl instead, with the US having a weak Navy in the Pacific (if it was in the Atlantic) which would definitely help Japan secure those raw materials it needed so badly while, at the same time, eliminating positions of threat to its expanding borders.
That is one direction to take. I would think that they would take advantage of the missing fleet by consolitating their areas and build up their fleet. Taking Hawaii, Midway stretches their supply lines and make it difficult to hold unless they leave a considerably sized fleet at Hawaii. To do this, they would have to thin out their fleet closer to home.

It is a damned if you do and damned if you don't situation.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
Reply With Quote