View Single Post
  #68 (permalink)  
Old November 9th, 2007, 03:11 AM
Roddoss72 Roddoss72 is offline
Dishonorably Discharged
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 363
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Roddoss72 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: No Pearl Harbour

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
More to the point with the original premise is the US State Department's (and US) position on negotiations with Japan known as "Hull's four points"

The Four Principles enunciated by U.S. Secretary of State Hull as a basis for negotiation with Japan:

1. Respect for the territorial integrity and the sovereignty of each and all nations.

2. Support of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

3. Support of the principle of equality, including equality of commercial opportunity.

4. Non-disturbance of the status quo in the Pacific except as the status quo may be altered by peaceful means.

By this standard, Japan still faces a massive US embargo that will cripple their economy, arms shipments to China, the USSR, and other nations in the Pacific realm, a continued build up of US military infrastructure and capacity as well as diplomatic pressure to end hostilities with (in this case) the USSR.

And, the problem of British and Dutch embargos that would be a wholly seperate issue have not been addressed. If Japan invades the USSR their whole (note that) WHOLE economy crashes into a massive depression in under six (6!) months.
With, as this scenario as proposed, the entire Imperial Army and Navy engaged in a war with the Soviets and the quickly looming prospect of their home economy collapsing into ruin what do the Japanese do? They have nothing to use militarily to attack the US, Britain, or the DEI it is committed to a fight with the Soviets.
Japan is doomed and about to be ruined.

Oh, one might note that the Imperial Japansese Navy of the period was incapable of using aerial directed shore bombardment from ships. The system and technique did not exist in their doctrine. While ships can provide self-directed fire they cannot use forward observers on the ground on in aircraft for this purpose.
Well your response is defeated in my senario, as America lifs all santions to Japan, due to Nationalist China (the Legitimate Government) and Japan make peace.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
Note also that the Soviets could launch a second front from Mongolia and the Trans-Bakal region into eastern Manchucko. This would pose a problem for a planned single front Japanese assault on the Vladivostock region.
Then what, their is one factor you have forgotten, Nationalist China and Communist China are at war, so the Soviet Union would have to support the Communist Chinese, and that would make an enemy of Nationalist China, so in the end the Soviets would be forced into conflict with Nationalist China as, Nationalist China has signed the Anti-Commintern Pact with Japan, Germany and Italy, any offensive into China by Soviet forces would be construde as helping the Chinese Communist, thus Japan and Nationalist China would becom allies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp View Post
Well then its settled, the Japanese could not do much. Thread closed!
Exceptionally arrogant of you, to close my thread, i say don't come back to this thread.
Reply With Quote