Thread: Sturmgewehr 44
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 07:54 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
Sloniksp Sloniksp is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,464
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Sturmgewehr 44

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Williams View Post
Nope.

The M60 design borrowed certain design elements from the MG 42, and others from the FG 42, but it wasn't a straight copy of anything. In particular, its action is entirely different form the MG 42's (it's gas-operated rather than recoil-operated).

Nearly all of the elements of automatic weapons were patented by the early years of the last century (many of them by Maxim and Browning). Almost every design since then has borrowed heavily from earlier ones. That's entirely reasonable - why bother to reinvent the wheel?
Well said, I believe that Von Poop has adressed this issue.

Just because weapons might look a like, or one is an inspiration for the other, it does not mean that they are the same.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote