Thread: What do you think of the Siege of Tobruk
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old February 14th, 2008, 04:40 PM
Sturmkreuz's Avatar
Sturmkreuz Sturmkreuz is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Flanders
Posts: 639
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sturmkreuz Is actually quite decentSturmkreuz Is actually quite decentSturmkreuz Is actually quite decent
Default Re: What do you think of the Siege of Tobruk
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomcat View Post
The siege of Trobuk 'the longest sige in british history' well bing australian I follow the anzac's where ever they went, and I was wondering what anyone else thought of either the anzac, british or the german troops at trobuk. Do you think it was a thorn in rommels side, or should the brisith have evacuated it before hand, but would that have lost the north african war for the british? i have read many stories and first hand accounts of the relationship between the british and the aussie troops at this time and if rommel knew of the friction between the two would he have been more likely to try and push harder for tobruk?
What would've make the difference?

Hitler didn't gave something about relationships between countries. He cared about Victory, Jews & Oil (for his Panzer).

Hitler striked where he wanted to strike. Whenever there was a Donkey & a Horse he wouldn't care, he wanted that place, so he'll get that place.

If you still have a reason to let me believe, that the relationship between those two, could change a difference in German tactics.. you may tell me!
__________________
Soldat: Adam Weinberger
Dienstgrab: (Ober)Gefreiter
Vermisst: Januar(y) 1943 / Stadt Stalingrad
Einheit: (Nebel)Werfer-Regiment 51
Reply With Quote