Quote:
Originally Posted by creeper2ads
Sadly, erich was right! But that is good, for the yanks  |
And the limeys, canucks, frogs, russkies, aussies, etc, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repulse
its strange that hitler never used tirpitz i mean look at that armament it was a steel fortress and could of changed the war in europe very quickly if used.
|
Yes, it would change the war just like its sister-ship the Bismark did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich
Personally he should of sent it straight to the Baltic to help Wehrmacht ground forces, the Prinz and the Scheer proved themselves to be a very good Soviet Batterie busters along woith the assorted Zerstörers that had not been sunk during 44 into 45.
|
The Soviets would reroute their troops a few miles south and that would be it. Naval Ground Fire Support is only important within a very short range, strictly coastal indeed, if you can provide fire control. Over a dune you're firing blind.