View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old March 27th, 2008, 11:03 AM
mac_bolan00 mac_bolan00 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 154
mac_bolan00 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: strategic impact of special warfare

the SAS weren't named that during the war, right? attacking behind the lines at supply lines and other vulnerable targets can be done by both 'special' and regular forces. spec-war is supposed to be cheaper(??) and lead to fewer losses in men and material. at this point, i just don't know what might prompt a commander to choose between the two. but the objectives and payoffs are supposed to be the same. i could be wrong in that though.
Reply With Quote