View Single Post
  #76 (permalink)  
Old April 9th, 2008, 09:10 AM
Za Rodinu's Avatar
Za Rodinu Za Rodinu is online now
Ace
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 6,052
Za Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really nice
Default Re: German favour Mark IV as main battle tank?

Quote:
Originally Posted by machine shop tom View Post
This is from a post early in this resurrected thread.

http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/pz4_pz5.jpg
Tom, the later Pz IVs were already way overweight with the bigger gun, 80mm armour, schurzen. Suspensions and transmissions were overloaded, and as a consequence mobility and reliability suffered. Do you want to overload the poor donkey even more?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl W Schwamberger View Post
Hmmm... side & top armor under 25mm thick, sounds like one of the "soft" vehicals the aircraft trashed so often. I do know such vehicals are about as vulnerable to artillery HE/fragmentation fires as any light armor & a hit within a meter or so is trouble and a direct hit anywhere is doom, unlike medium tanks which can survive one or maybe two such hits.
Please explain why 25mm top armour is unsufficient, comparable to soft-skin vehicles, and why "medium tanks" are so different. Do you have any firing range figures for us?
__________________
Bah!
Reply With Quote