View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old April 22nd, 2008, 04:07 PM
bf109 emil's Avatar
bf109 emil bf109 emil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, CANADA
Posts: 122
bf109 emil is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: SWISS NEUTRALITY

To me neutrality means not helping or hindering a side or country....Switzerland did not do this...they had a direct role in the economy, and purchases, along with rail passage for the third reich...to bear a direct and more at home bearing...in Robert Baer novel/biography sleeping with the enemy...he states for fact that the Saudi Royal family paid, funded, allowed 14 of the 16 hijacker terrorist on 9/11 direct funding...for 2 years money was placed through ATM machines, by the Saudi Royals in the country of Qatar and continued to do so, which allowed the taking of aviation lessons, rent, board,shelter...yet any discussions as to the Saudi born highjackers is not allowed to be questioned or blame laid....is this being neutral???Should Saudi Arabia be held accountable??? The answer must be no, if past pressidence(SP?) by countries like switzerland, sweden, spain are used, then Saudi Arabia bears no blame or burden...albeit the 2300 whom fell within the twin towers might decide otherwise...

sorry for going off topic, but because a country has a head in the sand policy doesn't make it neutral, as did Saudi Arabia funding Al Qadea directly through Qatar ATM'S

bf109 Emil
Reply With Quote