Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
I never suggested Mr. Hardman should be denied an opinion. I merely implied that Hr. Hardman is a complete daft.
|
Again, that's YOUR opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
Nor is the occupation of France any more "news" to the French, but thanks for not answering the question anyway
|
A bit pointless answering a question which you yourself had already answered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
. So what is Mr. Hardman's point then? Is he stating to all readers at how historically illiterate he really is, or is this just another "sticking it to the French" article?? What was it then, the whole point of the article?
|
He was commenting on a piece of news. The only one who seems to have an ulterior motive around it seems to be you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
By this logic, we should also give Signal the benefit of the doubt and discuss the merits of it's articles?
|
Picture Post and
The War Illustrated from the same period weren't impartial either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
It is another for Mr.Hardman and the Daily Mail to stoop to a propaganda piece and draw conclusions from it
|
Interesting that you think reporting news is "stooping to a propaganda piece".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asterix
What next - Der Sturmer to be used as a credible and viable source?
|
An amusing comment from someone who quoted an inaccurate entry on wikipedia.