View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old April 26th, 2008, 09:15 PM
Bravo104's Avatar
Bravo104 Bravo104 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Almere The Netherlands
Posts: 24
Bravo104 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

@JC;

Okay, there is no way I can or will argue with that. That was so true. If it were the newspaperman, I don't know. But there was a lot of propaganda involved.


But you miss the point in my 'what if'.
I stated that if Chamberlain, etc. etc. the germans would have gone to war a couple years later and there would have been more time to develop their army and weaponry.
So, less horses, more armour, planes, ships, a fully developed V1, the V2 halfway, etc. etc.
Let's just say they went to war in '42 for example. Two years later there will be the first jetfighter. Can you picture it?
That's why I stated that in this 'If what' there would have been no allies and England would be runover bij the Germans.

And that's how it al started.
Reply With Quote