View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 09:27 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kai-PetriOKF Moderator Kai-Petri is offline
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,472
Salute!: 46
Saluted 17 Times in 16 Posts
Kai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really nice
Unhappy Re: Pearl Harbor Conspiracy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl W Schwamberger View Post
The torpedo question is silly. It had been clearly demostrated several times in the 1920s & 1930s what aircraft bombs could do to a anchored warship. For a decade the USN had been developing dive bomber tactics to use against armored warships, and we knew the Japanese were working at similar capabilities. In any case torpedos would not be used against the machine shops, oil tanks, drydocks, aircraft, ect... Claiming that lack of knowledge of torpedo capability in shallow water decived anyone about the possibility of a attack sounds stupid.
The US propaganda at the same time claimed the Japanese did not have 3-D vision and could not thus fly their planes and thus not even bomb the ships. Now THAT is silly.

Propaganda of Japan and the U.S. During WW II

In one of the most famous, and perhaps most fantastic and blatant misconceptions of the Japanese, historian Arthur Marder thought the Japanese to be inherently inferior, especially in the art of war, for several reasons, one being “because of their eye slits… the Japanese fighter pilots could not shoot straight, and Japanese naval officers could not see in the dark” (65). Captain Vivian from Tokyo said that Japanese were incapable of springing surprise in battle because they have “peculiarly slow brains”....
__________________
Reply With Quote