View Single Post
  #65 (permalink)  
Old May 8th, 2008, 02:00 PM
tikilal's Avatar
tikilal tikilal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 837
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
tikilal Is actually quite decenttikilal Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Best Tank of WW2??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by acker View Post
If a tank burns out its engine, breaks a track, shatters a sprocket, etc., the result is pretty much the same as a direct knock-out. A broken-down tank is generally abandoned by its crew, despite the "heavy" gun. You know why? Because an enemy tank doesn't even have to engage the target in order to knock it out. The enemy can simply bombard the broken-down tank with artillery, then move on. The enemy doesn't even have to risk his armor to engage the "broken down" tank. Tank vs. tank combat was a minority as to how tanks died. Most tanks were destroyed by artillery, mines, or AT guns. Also, for the broken-down tank to engage enemies, it has to break down in an awfully convenient place...
I was replying to Slons statement about the Panther crews running because some T-34s were coming. Neither he or I think that the only way to knock out a tank is with a tank. Please also note that if a tank breaks down you will not see the crew instantly jump out of it. Oh and in the case of the Tiger the number cause for destruction we demolition by the crew.
__________________
The Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands..." — Mohamed Akram. http://jihadwatch.org/
Reply With Quote