View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old July 9th, 2008, 08:36 PM
mikebatzel's Avatar
mikebatzel mikebatzel is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NEPA/Scranton(close enough)
Posts: 1,246
Salute!: 46
Saluted 33 Times in 28 Posts
mikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nice
Default Re: britains involvement in world war II

Quote:
Originally Posted by panzer paul View Post
As most of you should know Britain only played a minor role in WWII. iIs blitz is highly overrated as losses are only estimated at 0.1 percent of the population its military use played only secondary roles in 1939-1940 it was France,s secondary partner in 1941-1945 it was aAerican,s. In the desert was the only time Britain fought alone & fair enough it reached a kind of stalemate with the Axis on most fronts. If invaded it would have been anhillated. the Germans would have less resistance in Britain then in Denmark.

Do you know anything of the sacrafices those men and women made? If you want to go by you silly percentage, than the UK would be at around 1%. Not .1%. And that is of the overall population in 1939. Using the same numbers the United States is at .34%, but as you say the Uk was only an overratted minor ally. Puh. I wonder, without a very large Island that a very important Ally controlled, where the Normandy invasion is staged from? Florida? Why post a bomb like this anyways? Only Secondary roles? I wonder whos navy it was that fought the Italians in the Med up untill 42?


__________________
"Like so many of our people, we have now had a personal experience of German barbarity which only strengthens the resolution of all of us to fight through to final victory."-King George VI
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."-Colonel David M. Shoup-Saipan

Last edited by mikebatzel; July 9th, 2008 at 08:53 PM. Reason: Added a chart