View Single Post
  #66 (permalink)  
Old August 16th, 2009, 04:12 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
T. A. Gardner T. A. Gardner is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,742
Salute!: 4
Saluted 288 Times in 197 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Top 5 Tank Destroyers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proeliator View Post
Smoother ?? That's a very odd statement. There was no difference in the "smoothness" of the turret travel between a Sherman or any German tank, only a difference in turret traverse speed. So I'm not sure why you would say such a thing.
Smoother. In a late war German tank traverse was hydraulic and dependent on engine speed for speed of rotation. The gunner could only roughly lay the turret on target and had to make final adjustments by hand with the manual controls. This is due to the inability to fine control the rate of traverse with the hydraulic system. Hydraulics take a light touch (try operating heavy construction equipment some time) and can be jerky if you are heavy handed in their operation. They also don't respond instantly to changes in motion.
US vehicles had a variable speed electric traverse that allowed the gunner to both fast traverse onto a target then use low speed and fine control to lay the gun. This made for a much faster on target time that has been repeatedly documented in numerous histories. And, in tank engagements he who is on target first and firing first usually wins.
Reply With Quote