View Single Post
  #44 (permalink)  
Old October 23rd, 2009, 08:10 PM
LJAd LJAd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 331
Salute!: 25
Saluted 13 Times in 11 Posts
LJAd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Battle of Moscow is not really talked about, But yet Stalingrad is more talked about. Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp View Post
Sorry LJad, but this is incorrect. The largest casualties suffered by the Red Army in WW2 was in 1941. In 1943 the Red Army suffered 1 million casualties less then in 42'.

RED ARMY CASUALTIES
Total Killed, Missing, or Captured
1941- 2,993,803
1942- 2,993,536
1943- 1,977,127
1944- 1,412,335
1945- 631,633

As for the German casualties.....
September 1939-
1 September 1942 - 922,000 (Over 90 % in the East)

1 September 1942-
20 November 1943 -2,077,000 (Over 90 % in the East)

20 November 1943-
June 1944 1,500,000 est. (80 % in the East)
About the German casualties in the East:
1941 830000 Combat Losses (Death,wounded and missing)
1942115000
1943 1442000
1944 2000000
For 1941:27 weeks :an average of 30000 a week
For 1942:20000 weekly
For 1943:30000 weekly (luftwaffe losses are not included )
For 1944:40000 weekly
About the Russian Casualties :my figures are from Krivosheev :Total losses minus sick and frostbites
I thin k it is wrong not to count wounded ,otherwise you have as German casualties in the East for 1941 only 22OOOO men,and that's is giving a wrong picture .
Of the wounded:a lot were mutilated and discharged from the army,ex a soldier who lost 2 legs is for the army the same as a death,others recovered but were unfit for front service and others were at the date in qiestion ,ex 31 december 1941 still in hospital .
The ratio between German and Soviet losses was (rough figures )
1941 :1:5
1942 :1:6
1943 :1:4.5
1944:1:3
For 1945 there are no reliable figures for the German losses
Cheers
Reply With Quote