Axis

Members: 12,640
Threads: 26,917
Posts: 330,227
Online: 182

Newest Member:
klb-61

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > Theaters of the Second World War > Battle for Europe
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Battle for Europe Concerning WW2 in Europe, spanning the invasion of France, the Battle of Britain, D-Day to VE Day.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old September 14th, 2009, 02:05 PM
lwd lwd is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,254
Salute!: 9
Saluted 59 Times in 51 Posts
lwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by GI546 View Post
the only problem i can see with that is the captured german troops might turn on the allies in battle and that they defect back to the nazis...
There are a number of problems or potential problems with using former German soldiers against the Soviets in this scenario. The above is not one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old September 14th, 2009, 05:27 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 195
Salute!: 14
Saluted 7 Times in 6 Posts
LJAd is on a distinguished road
Unhappy Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by brndirt1 View Post
The B-29 could easily reach Moscow from the British Isles, or Egypt both of which were in allied hands, or even from New Delhi India if needed. All well within its operational range.

As to fighter cover, the VVS would be hard pressed to reach the height at which the B-29 Silverplates would drop their atomics, over 35,000 feet. During the war years themselves they received about 90%+ of their avgas from the USA, that wouldn't be there to use in this case. If needed these P-82 twin Mustangs would have filled the bill nicely I suspect, and wouldn't have been canceled after only 20 were built.

The first production model was the P-82B (Model NA-123), with a pair of Packard Merlin V-1560-19/21 engines. Five hundred production P-82Bs were ordered by the USAAF. These P-82Bs were basically similar to the XP-82, but differed in having provisions for underwing racks capable of carrying four 1000-pound bombs, two 2000-pound bombs, or 25 5-inch rockets. A central pod carrying eight additional 0.50-inch machine guns could also be fitted.

The P-82B was one of the hottest piston-engined fighters of the war. Maximum speed was 482 mph at 25,100 feet. Normal range was 1390 miles at 227 mph, 1280 miles with a 4000-pound bomb load. Service ceiling was 41,600 feet, and an altitude of 20,000 feet could be attained in 7 minutes. Weights were 13,405 pounds empty, 19,100 pounds normal loaded, and 22,000 pounds maximum. Dimensions were wingspan 51 feet 3 inches, length 38 feet 1 inches, height 13 feet 10 inches, and wing area of 408 square feet.

Only twenty of these P-82Bs had been built by the time of V-J Day (serials were 44-65160/65179). None of these planes managed to get overseas before the end of the war. The end of the war against Japan resulted in the cancellation of the remaining 480 of these P-82Bs.
On February 28, 1947, P-82B serial number 44-65168 piloted by Robert E. Thacker and his copilot John M. Ard flew nonstop without refueling from Hickam Field, Hawaii to LaGuardia Airport, New York, covering a distance of 4968 miles in 14 hours 31 minutes 50 seconds for an average speed of 342 mph. This airplane, named *Betty Joe* after Thacker's wife, carried four external fuel tanks under the wings for this flight. This was the longest unrefuelled flight ever carried out by a piston-engined fighter. The record still stands.

See:

North American P-82B Twin Mustang

It would still have taken an aggressive move by the USSR and Stalin for that to come to the fore, and that wasn't going to happen, and Patton wasn't being listened to (thank goodness). This is a non-starter under any circumstances, everybody was tired of war, and just wanted to get their men home, and start a "non-war" life style up again.
Stupid me :first looking at the available information and then asking stupid questions,especially when Brndirt 1 is looking
Reply With Quote
The Following User Salutes LJAd For This Useful Post:
cylon47 (October 6th, 2009)
  #28 (permalink)  
Old September 14th, 2009, 05:38 PM
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a windmill
Posts: 3,897
Salute!: 298
Saluted 254 Times in 183 Posts
urqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to all
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

What?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old September 14th, 2009, 10:18 PM
Smithson's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 137
Salute!: 23
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
Smithson is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

This could be true because stalin was complaining about the british not helping them and they were getting pushed back!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old September 15th, 2009, 12:27 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 872
Salute!: 0
Saluted 24 Times in 16 Posts
Carl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decentCarl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decentCarl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Tried to read the articall but it stank. This Hastings must have sat down that morning and pondered what he might write that would spin the crank of the nazifanbois. Churchill was suffering a bit from 'fatigue' by 1945. One of the several reasons Atlee replaced him that year. After retiring from the US Army Eisenhower was asked by interviewer about "the plan to fight the USSR". Ike replied that there was some talk about that from some politicians but no one took it very seriously. From that interview and other remarks by US officers like Bradley, Hodge, Devers it appears some proforma discussion was made and some staff officers assigned to make up a 'Plan' to show to the politician Ike refered to.
__________________
I forgot my password, can I use yours?
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old September 15th, 2009, 12:30 AM
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a windmill
Posts: 3,897
Salute!: 298
Saluted 254 Times in 183 Posts
urqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to all
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Now that sounds reasonable c.w.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old September 15th, 2009, 01:22 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 885
Salute!: 67
Saluted 27 Times in 24 Posts
Totenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by GI546 View Post
the only problem i can see with that is the captured german troops might turn on the allies in battle and that they defect back to the nazis...
...unless they would be brainwashed....
Seeing as the Nazis wouldnt exist after Germany's defeat...
__________________
-Dustin

"Zey send zer hounds! zey to vill find only death!"
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old September 19th, 2009, 06:58 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 10
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Potsdammer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

As the Wehrmacht had been fighting the Russians for the best part of 3 years and bearing in mind the Soviet reatment in places like Köenigsberg and Nemmersdorf (whatever the truth was or is) was enough to convince them to return to fight. The only problem was that Hitler had always thought that the Allies would see the error of their ways and fight the red beast but the allies had fought with them against national socialism so there would be an impression of a possible stitch up, or a fear of being used as canon practice, amongst the Wehrmacht.

Sorry perhaps that wasn't too clear but I feel that they would not trust the Allies as, in their eyes, they had been responsible from preventing the Nazis from crushing the Soviets and then to accept what the great dictator had been saying from the beginning that the Soviets were the true enemy won't just have caused problems at the time but would have sown the seeds for a greater problem in the German lands later. In order to allow the Germans to participate would have meant re armanent, and realignment and would have allowed the Nazis ,who only hid during the last days of the war, to reappear as renaissance figures for Western Europe. perhaps the whole point of war would have seemed a little pointless.

Last edited by Potsdammer; September 19th, 2009 at 07:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Salutes Potsdammer For This Useful Post:
cylon47 (October 6th, 2009)
  #34 (permalink)  
Old September 21st, 2009, 02:36 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

I have serious doubts as to what Germans would be available for this excursion. Even Hitler could only field third rate divisions at the end. Why would anyone do better?
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old September 21st, 2009, 11:51 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 4,344
Salute!: 233
Saluted 99 Times in 72 Posts
Sloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple C View Post
I have serious doubts as to what Germans would be available for this excursion. Even Hitler could only field third rate divisions at the end. Why would anyone do better?
No one would.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
The Following User Salutes Sloniksp For This Useful Post:
cylon47 (October 6th, 2009)
  #36 (permalink)  
Old October 6th, 2009, 07:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 16
Salute!: 4
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
cylon47 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

why german why not the soviet troops the germans had caputured against their own men.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old October 6th, 2009, 09:02 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 4,344
Salute!: 233
Saluted 99 Times in 72 Posts
Sloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by cylon47 View Post
why german why not the soviet troops the germans had caputured against their own men.
Most Soviet troops in German captivity died of starvation. The ones which had survived were liberated by the Red Army only to be sent to the Gulags for "allowing to be captured".
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old October 7th, 2009, 04:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Soviet troops the Germans captured were basically worthless. They were knocked around easily in Normandy and were considered third rate troops. My question is still not answered: What was left of the German Army, except "foot-and-eye" cases, old men and Hilter Jungend? I can't think of any battle worthy troops the Germans have got left; unless they want to reopen the POW pen, they would not have much to work on. Even so, they would have no equipment and possibly of low morale.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2009, 09:44 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 195
Salute!: 14
Saluted 7 Times in 6 Posts
LJAd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple C View Post
Soviet troops the Germans captured were basically worthless. They were knocked around easily in Normandy and were considered third rate troops. My question is still not answered: What was left of the German Army, except "foot-and-eye" cases, old men and Hilter Jungend? I can't think of any battle worthy troops the Germans have got left; unless they want to reopen the POW pen, they would not have much to work on. Even so, they would have no equipment and possibly of low morale.
what was left of the German army ? I should say:some 6 million;were there a lot of battle worthy troops ? Idon't know What is a lot ?Were they all foot-and -aye cases,old men and Hitlerjugend ? Off course not .
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2009, 10:31 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 4,344
Salute!: 233
Saluted 99 Times in 72 Posts
Sloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of lightSloniksp is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJAd View Post
what was left of the German army ? I should say:some 6 million;were there a lot of battle worthy troops ? Idon't know What is a lot ?Were they all foot-and -aye cases,old men and Hitlerjugend ? Off course not .
Are these so called 6 million troops of proper age? or are they the 14-17 and the over 55yr old conscripts?
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 01:52 AM
redcoat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 1,139
Salute!: 25
Saluted 58 Times in 38 Posts
redcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp View Post
Most Soviet troops in German captivity died of starvation. The ones which had survived were liberated by the Red Army only to be sent to the Gulags for "allowing to be captured".
It is estimated that around 3.5 million of 5.5 million Soviet POW's in German captivity died through ill-treatment.
In regards the survivors, according to Soviet sources, they liberated 1,836,562 Soviet POW's from German captivity, of these nearly 1,000,000 were sent back to service in the Soviet Army, another 600,000 were sent to labour battalions, and only the 233,400 who were suspected of collaborating with the Germans (ie Hiwis) were sent to the gulags
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!

Last edited by redcoat; October 10th, 2009 at 02:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Salutes redcoat For This Useful Post:
Sloniksp (October 12th, 2009)
  #42 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 06:10 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 885
Salute!: 67
Saluted 27 Times in 24 Posts
Totenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

I would think many of those deaths were of starvation. I would think anybody would know that the Germans could never feed the amount of POWs they had; it makes sense the Russians got less then Westerners. Racism strikes yet again.
__________________
-Dustin

"Zey send zer hounds! zey to vill find only death!"
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 12:14 PM
redcoat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 1,139
Salute!: 25
Saluted 58 Times in 38 Posts
redcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
I would think many of those deaths were of starvation. I would think anybody would know that the Germans could never feed the amount of POWs they had; it makes sense the Russians got less then Westerners. Racism strikes yet again.
Even before the invasion the Nazi leadership had calculated that due to weaknesses in their logistics they would have to plunder the foodstuffs of the local population in the invasion areas in order to feed their troops and horses to such an extent that it would lead to mass starvation amongst the the civilian population, let alone any POW's who fell into their hands.
This didn't cause any concern as the de-population of these areas was an important part of the Nazi plans for German farmers to settle in these areas
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!

Last edited by redcoat; October 10th, 2009 at 04:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 07:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 195
Salute!: 14
Saluted 7 Times in 6 Posts
LJAd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat View Post
It is estimated that around 3.5 million of 5.5 million Soviet POW's in German captivity died through ill-treatment.
In regards the survivors, according to Soviet sources, they liberated 1,836,562 Soviet POW's from German captivity, of these nearly 1,000,000 were sent back to service in the Soviet Army, another 600,000 were sent to labour battalions, and only the 233,400 who were suspected of collaborating with the Germans (ie Hiwis) were sent to the gulags
I have seen on AHF much lower figures (I think 2.5 )of dead POW
About the survivors :the numbers are not plausible :the Hiwis sent to the Gulag were not POW and could not be liberated by the Soviet Army .Most of the Hiwis captured by the Soviets were shot .
Thus :who were the men sent to the Gulag ?
An other point:don't forget Stalin's infamous order of 1941 ,in which all POW were declared traitors ,thus I think all Soviet POW were candidates for the Gulag .
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 07:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 195
Salute!: 14
Saluted 7 Times in 6 Posts
LJAd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp View Post
Are these so called 6 million troops of proper age? or are they the 14-17 and the over 55yr old conscripts?
I do think that the Hitlerjugend and Volksturm were a minority
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2009, 08:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 885
Salute!: 67
Saluted 27 Times in 24 Posts
Totenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the roughTotenkopf is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

When you look at areas like Yugoslavia, Greece, Norway and Italy that had large occupation groups; it would seem that they would be Static with the manpower they had before.
__________________
-Dustin

"Zey send zer hounds! zey to vill find only death!"
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2009, 01:50 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Long Island, New York - United States
Posts: 291
Salute!: 16
Saluted 13 Times in 11 Posts
MastahCheef117 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

I believe this was also Patton's plan. If the Soviets ever invaded a once-free Europe Patton wanted to use his tanks, Britain's airforce and Germany's SS against the hordes of Soviets.
__________________


Easily the most overpowered tank in history. Seriously - dual 280mm cannons?! It's not like the Allies had a tank with 200mm of armor!
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2009, 10:11 AM
Tomcat's Avatar
The One From Down Under
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 2,591
Salute!: 165
Saluted 62 Times in 47 Posts
Tomcat is just really niceTomcat is just really niceTomcat is just really niceTomcat is just really niceTomcat is just really niceTomcat is just really nice
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Why only the SS, there were far more experienced, battle hardened and reliable men in the German army then the SS.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2009, 09:51 PM
redcoat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 1,139
Salute!: 25
Saluted 58 Times in 38 Posts
redcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Totenkopf View Post
When you look at areas like Yugoslavia, Greece, Norway and Italy that had large occupation groups; it would seem that they would be Static with the manpower they had before.
Most of these by the end of the war were garrison troops. Troops who even the Germans in their desperate situation didn't consider fit for use on the front line, all the useful units had been withdrawn months before.
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old October 29th, 2009, 04:38 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 28
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Kobalt04 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Churchill wanted to use captured Nazi troops to drive the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe

It is an interesting scenario: the Western Allies v. the Soviet Union and its allies in a war for Eastern Europe. The US would have had to resort to using atomic weapons against the USSR. I don't think that the West would have won a conventional or non-atomic war against the Soviets in the immediate post-war period. The article portrays Churchill as a realist when dealing with Stalin and the Soviets; and when dealing with Stalin and the Soviets, one most definitely ought to have been of a realistic cast of mind. Had the Western Allies taken Berlin and advanced further eastwards across Germany and possibly Poland and further into Czechoslovakia, it would have definitely placed Stalin and the Soviets in the position where they would have to honour the commitments that they had made to the Western Allies, especially preserving or re-instituting a free and democratic Poland. I think that there can be little doubt about this.

Last edited by Kobalt04; October 29th, 2009 at 05:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Army Units use of captured German Artilley in Europe JCFalkenbergIII Battle for Europe 109 March 27th, 2009 05:53 PM
Sounds of the Soviet Union. Vet Russia at War 6 August 11th, 2008 09:05 AM
What stopped the Soviet Union? SV What If? 56 October 3rd, 2006 06:04 PM
Soviet Union Machine Gun Nest 1985. What If? 15 April 6th, 2006 04:16 PM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies