Were there any plans made to attack the Fleet by the US after the Pearl Harbor attack to revenge immediately? The Japanese were prepared but no-one came after them according to the Japanese.

(The Pearl Harbor Papers: Inside the Japanese Plans: Books by Donald Goldstein,Katherine Dillon)

1. Should the US have attacked the Japanese Fleet straight after Pearl? Opinions?

2.Could they have attacked i.e. did they have enough forces available in the area?

__________________

This would have been difficult to manage. First, the Japanese were running on empty and needed to retire and refuel, particularly their destroyers. Second, the US really did not have a firm fix on where the Japanese fleet was, its composition or, its course. All of this would have been necessary for even attempting a sorte against it.
Also, the US Navy was not about to send just a surface action group (to use the current venacular) out looking to engage the Japanese on its own. Without air cover(ie., a carrier or carriers) such a group was highly vulnerable to air attack....something that was pretty obviously the Japanese strong suit at the moment.
Lastly, even if an attempt was made the distance between the fleets was sufficently great that interception was not likely.
No, the best thing for the US to have done was what they did originally; hunker down in a defense mode, lick their wounds and, live to fight another day.

I agree. After so many losses, the command probably was so traumatized that it did not conceive it could hit back so soon even with the aircraft carriers intact. Also, they did expect immediate attacks against mainland states so waiting was the best course.

__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!