|
|  |
 |
Members: 5,593
Threads: 17,270
Posts: 215,143
Online: 258
Newest Member:
alexkoe |
|
|
| Military History The place for non-WWII military history discussion. |

March 24th, 2004, 04:45 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
e.g. MOBAT, WOMBAT etc.
Does anybody know much about them? 
|

March 24th, 2004, 04:52 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,373
Salute!: 0
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
The Wombat is a 120mm recoilless rifle. It was roughly the equivalent of the US 105 recoilless of the late 50's and 60's.
|

March 24th, 2004, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
That much i already knew  MOBAT was the predeccessor to WOMBAT, used in the 50's (towable by the Champ!), again 120mm, you can tell the two apart from the breech, one slides down to relaod and one swings to the side. But I'd really like to know more about the whole series of them and all the dates and such. 
|

March 24th, 2004, 06:58 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Library
Posts: 3,188
Salute!: 7
Saluted 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Flozi,
Think the Wombat was replaced in the late 70s by the Carl Gustav-don't quote me though.
Regards,
Gordon
|

March 24th, 2004, 07:12 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
WOMBAT was used in the Falklands [img]tongue.gif[/img]
And Carl Gustav is man portable whereas WOMBAT is towed, and a heck of a lot better at taking out tanks I should expect, but don't quote me on that either!
What I'm particularly interested in is dates of introduction, armour penetration, range etc., but information on them seems extraordinarily scarce. 
|

March 24th, 2004, 07:34 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Library
Posts: 3,188
Salute!: 7
Saluted 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Should have known that, my mate was in the Falklands with 21(?)ADR !
I'll ask him when he's back on in a wee while. He was REME, so he'll probably have that info.
Regards,
Gordon
|

March 24th, 2004, 09:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Cheers in advance 
|

March 26th, 2004, 04:16 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Library
Posts: 3,188
Salute!: 7
Saluted 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Flozi,
Sorry, my mate only used Carl Gustavs. Try the military gun and ammunition website.
www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/
Regards,
Gordon
[ 26. March 2004, 11:19 AM: Message edited by: The_Historian ]
|

March 26th, 2004, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Ah well  , I've found someone on the net who trained on MOBAT and WOMBAT, so hopefully they will shed some light on things
So far I have seen references to four guns in the series:
L1 BAT
L4 MOBAT
L6 WOMBAT
L7 CANBAT (which I have seen mentioned only one with no other details)
The L1 replaced the 17pdr at battalion level in the anti-tank role (Battallion Anti Tank) in the very early 50's (source - http://users.chariot.net.au/~jahill/army1.htm), MOBAT came along a little later and WOMBAT sometime after that, the L4 and L6 both being used in Aden.
i also found out that the MOBAT weighed 1700lb's (  ), but thats of no use to me
EDIT: actually it seems BAT was Bridage AT, but i knew that WOMBAT was Weapon Of Magnesium Battalion AT, sorry [img]tongue.gif[/img]
[ 26. March 2004, 04:09 PM: Message edited by: FLOZi ]
|

March 27th, 2004, 12:54 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Sorry for the double post but I thought it warranted it:
here's a picture of the L1 BAT, from http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWantitank.htm, which suggests it was perhaps around slightly after the end of the war.
I got the reply from the guy I emailed too:
Quote:
Hello Craig,
It is over 40 years ago since I fired the 120mm Mobat. When you read my memoirs I stated that we were not fully qualified. That is because support company was turned into a rifle company for the duration of our stay in the Cameroons.
When the battalion returned from the Cameroons being National servicemen and only 6 month to demob we were kept in a rifle company for the duration.
I have been looking at an old diary where I kept a few notes.
(a) The 120 mm mobat was no L 6A1 mounted on frameL2A1.
(b) An Hesh Round was used which was painted yellow.
(c)The Hesh was high explosive weight about 60lb.
(d) The mobat was accurate at 800yards and could put most tanks at that time in the sixties, out of action.
(e) The Mobat weighed 1700 LBS
(f) The eight main parts were
1.Peice
2.Cradle.
3.Saddle.
4.Sighting gear.
5.Breach.
6.LMG or sub calibre attachment.
7.Firing pin.
8.Elevating Gear.
The five good points were
1.Accuracy.
2.Mobility.
3.Flexibiliy.
4.Silouette.
5.Affect on armour.
Bad points were.
1.Back blast.
2.High trajectory.
Once one hit the target with your trace firing LMG you shouted stand by, then fired your mesh round.
While in Support company along with the res of thr platoon we stood by the Parachute regiment at Warcop in Cumbria and watched them firing the Wombat.
On a visit to the regimental museum in Carlisle castle about five years ago I noticed an old Mobat in a corner of the courtyard castle, why don't you make a few enquiries to see if it is still there.
Well Craig that is all I can help you with' I hope it helps with your research.
Best wishes
Alan
|
I'm beginning to suspect that MOBAT was BAT minus the gunshield and perhaps some other carriage changes (as it has the same breech), and WOMBAT was a new gun made of magnesium (thus being much lighter) for the paras. I saw another site of memoirs with a BAT (and Oxford carrier; what sort of timescale is that?) on so I will perhaps email the writer of that too.
EDIT: The Oxford Carrier was a late 40's design, used through the 50's, but the guy whos site i saw it on ( http://homepage.mac.com/barrybloke/lightning.html) with a BAT started his two year national service in 1954, so that gives me a good time reference. Seeing that a BAT was towed by an Oxford whereas MOBAT was towed by (or even mounted on) a mere little Champ seems to fit with my idea that it was a lightened BAT, perhaps the MO denotes MObile. [img]smile.gif[/img]
[ 27. March 2004, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: FLOZi ]
|

March 27th, 2004, 03:35 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Library
Posts: 3,188
Salute!: 7
Saluted 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Flozi,
The two squaddies in the pic appear to be wearing 1949 pattern battledress, which would date the pic somewhere between 1951 and 1964.
Regards,
Gordon
|

March 27th, 2004, 10:21 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,373
Salute!: 0
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Ok, here is a bit of history on the Wombat et. al.
The origins of British development of recoilless guns started about the middle of WW II under Sir Denis Burney. His designs grew from an original 4 gage shot gun into a 7.2" rifle using his special "wallbuster" shell. This gun was intended for use by field units in demolishing fortifications during the invasion of Europe.
Other recoilless rifles that were under development at that time included a 3.45" shoulder fired model and a 3.7" AT gun on a light wheeled tripod. A number of these weapons were being produced for the invasion of Japan.
Post war, Burney produced a 4.7" recoilless gun on a two wheeled trailer (the gun faced the hitch and a light shield was included) and a similar 7.2" model. The 4.7" gun was adopted by the British Royal Armament Research and Development Establishment in 1946 - 47 as the BAT. The design went through a number of changes that variously resulted in the CONBAT, MOBAT and, finally WOMBAT. Only the WOMBAT was formally adopted for service use that appears to span from about 1950 to about 1990.
|

March 27th, 2004, 11:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks, thats great!
MOBAT at least saw active service though, funny that it wasn't formally accepted 
|

January 28th, 2007, 01:25 PM
|
|
recruit
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: IRAQ!
Posts: 1
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Wombat, Weapon of Magnesium etc etc.
I served with 2 Para Anti Tank platoon on several occasions and took part in the A/Tank concentration competition in Hohne in `78 (which we won although we were using Conbats at the time.)
The main difference was a very cumbersome carriage which allowed the Conbat to be towed behind a 3/4 ton L/Rover. The Wombat was some 1000 lbs lighter (650 lbs),and therefore could be mounted on a stripped down. Portee LandRover. Obviously, in this configuration, it was far more manoeverable. There was a manually operated winch assembly on the Portee which helped drag the weapon back onboard after firing a dismounted action. Having said that, it could be fired off the back of the landrover when stationary. There were four Ready Use 120mm rounds contained in an assembly behind the driver for this. The Conbat had a true breech loading mechanism. A lever was pulled and the breech dropped down under gravity to allow the round to be loaded. The Wombat on the other hand, simply had a venturi which hinged open to allow loading. Both rounds were fired electrically and not by the use of a firing pin. Each round had a "contact band" around its base. When the spotting rifle achieved a hit, the main trigger (button), was pressed passing an electrical charge from the firing needle assembly to the contact band. This fired the main armament. Because it was electrically operated, people used to get "twitchy", when in close proximity to radio equipment in case there should be a premature, electrically initiated, firing of the round.
The BANG from these buggers going off was awesome to behold.
The round contained 28lbs of HE and could seriouly ruin your day if you were a Tanky!! When you were hit, you stayed hit. A near miss would supposedly kill or concuss the crew of a tank. The range was 2000 mtrs if the strike of the spotting rifle could be seen (because at 2000 mtrs, tracer in the spotting round will have burnt out.)
I heard that an AP round was available but never saw one. Neither did I ever see an Illume round though they did exist.
A real Beast of an Anti Tank weapon which really looked the part when mounted on a Portee Landrover. Limited in range by modern standards, but bloody hell, what a BANG!
__________________
Stubbo, Ex 2 Para
|

January 28th, 2007, 05:33 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,017
Salute!: 8
Saluted 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums Spud ! That is great information ! Can you tell us more about Iraq please ? The truth is hard to come by this day and age !
__________________
Work Harder ! Millions on welfare are depending on you.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |