Re: the divisional system
Well Britain doesn't really use the 'divisional system' in the same way the US, Germany and the USSR did. Instead most units are identified by their regiment and various regiments will contribute however many of their battallions to a brigade which will be part of a division with all it's associated resources.
The system has various pros and cons, since most of the regiments have a long and impressive history often dating back hundreds of years, usually associated with a particular area of the nation which helps to build cameraderie and pride. It also means that entire regiments will train in a particular role without having to provide resources such as artillery, signallers, engineers or logistics, all of which are provided from outside by the various corps. It works well enough for us I reckon and is good for giving soldiers a sense of identity, I've yet to meet anyone (outside HQ) who identified themself by their division over their regiment. Incidentally, I just noticed that my Brigade (15 North East, part of 2 Div) is the biggest in the British army at the mo and has 10,500 members, which I suppose makes a British division quite big.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|