|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,568
Threads: 15,652
Posts: 195,555
Online: 144
Newest Member:
abi_abi4289 |
|
|
| North Africa and the Mediterranean Monty, Rommel and everything in between. |

January 25th, 2008, 12:33 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,081
|
|
Taking back Crete
We all know how Crete fell to the Germans. But I have not been able to find out how the Allies took back Crete. Was it ever invaded? Did the Germans abandon it or was it manned until the surrender?
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

January 25th, 2008, 05:59 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 13,468
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
I think the Allied tried to take some eastern Med islands in autumn 1944 and Germans sent troops to take them back, which strategically, was the best choice for Germans of course....Uncle Adolf´s wisdom again. Like they did not need troops elsewehere.
So I think after that the islands stayed in German hands until the war was over.
__________________
|

January 25th, 2008, 07:08 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
The Germans withdrew from Crete - almost bloodlessly - during October 1944, at the same time that their forces were abandoning mainland Greece.
OSS and SOE agents were heavily involved in Crete at the time, and in fact the Allies were more concerned that harassment to the Germans from partisans of ELAS ( Nationalist ) and EOK ( Communist ) would lead to a civilian bloodbath as reprisal from the German forces.
After the Germans withdrew, the Allies were again concerned about fighting between ELAS & EOK and a possible Communist takeover.
I must say that it is extremely complex to read about ; there's a very good account of all this in Antony Beevor's book 'Crete'.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

January 25th, 2008, 07:53 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 13,468
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
Thanx for remembering it better Martin!

__________________
|

January 25th, 2008, 07:56 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
( I couldn't remember it, Kai - I had to go and look it up in the book !   )
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

January 25th, 2008, 07:59 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 13,468
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
Interesting. i did some digging myself on the subject... a while back...
War in the Aegean, Oct 1944 to July ´45
__________________
|

February 6th, 2008, 06:27 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 297
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
didn't the Nazis drop some paratroopers over Crete but they all got slaughtered?
|

February 6th, 2008, 06:37 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
The Germans originally invaded Crete by using paratroopers dropped from Ju 52s. They did indeed take very heavy losses - so much so, that the Germans never again launched major paratroop operations. But the British and Dominion forces on Crete overestimated the strength of the Germans and underestimated their own position - and the Germans won the battle.
Again, Beevor's book gives an excellent account of the story.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

February 6th, 2008, 11:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 133
|
|
Re: Taking back Crete
Depends how you look at it.
Students pre-operation casualty estimates for Merkur suggested around 1 in 3 Fallschirmjager would become casualties... a rather profound and accurate estimation. He realised the operation would be heavy in losses but he was of the opinion that airborne operations would always be due to the nature of the beast, as had been the case in Norway and Holland.
The real problem for the Germans, and the reason that strategic airborne operations were curtailed was the losses in transport aircraft and crews. Crete bled the transport fleets white and when added to the losses in Holland and Norway, it was losses they could not replace or afford. It is also interesting to note the knock-on effect that losses in airborne operations had on Luftwaffe bomber crew training as many of the transport crews were made up from those assigned to training bomber crews as it was felt that a high degree of accuracy was required when dropping paratroopers.
After Crete Germany only carried out smaller tactical airborne operations but they did not stop the planning and indeed preparation for large strategic operations. Till the end of the war, large amounts of parachutes were kept ready for airborne operations and development of gliders continued as the Germans saw them as a better means of delivery than the parachute. Later German operations laid some of the groundwork for post-war special forces doctrine showing the possibilities of a vertically deployed force in undertaking tactical operations.
__________________
"The Americans will always do the right thing ... After they've exhausted all the alternatives."
Winston Churchill
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |