Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Outnumbered?

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by Machine Gun Nest 1985., Apr 9, 2006.

  1. chocapic

    chocapic Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    723
    Likes Received:
    48
    Thanks for numbers Kai, it's hard to cross examine Glanz and Werth numbers, but at least I would say that it goes against a common misbelief : "the Red Army had such a huge numerical advantage it won the war because Germans had not enough bullets to kill'em all" ;)
     
  2. Nikita Kruschev

    Nikita Kruschev Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Quick question here, had the Germans not used so many men in Russia but relyed on superior fighting would the Western front been easier to hold against the approaching Americans/British/Canadians come 1944?
     
  3. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    I donĀ“t think you can take the troops from the Ostfront or it will collapse definitely. If you compare the Red Army had some 5 million men in arms ( more or less ) and in the West they had some 500,000-700,000 (?) or more. Maybe someone can give a more precise figure on the Allied troops in West June-Dec 1944.
     

Share This Page