Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Russian Flying Fortress

Discussion in 'Aircraft' started by LRusso216, Oct 8, 2009.

  1. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Now here's a plane.

    [​IMG]

    "In 1930s [FONT=&quot]Russian[/FONT] army was … by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, [FONT=&quot]jet propulsion[/FONT] has not been implemented at those times yet. Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.
    Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in [FONT=&quot]full color[/FONT]. This is one example based on ideas of Russian [FONT=&quot]aviation engineers[/FONT] of that times."


    [​IMG]




    English Russia » Russian Flying Fortresses
     
    brndirt1 likes this.
  2. MastahCheef117

    MastahCheef117 Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    380
    Likes Received:
    17
    LOL that translation is terrible j/k

    Imagine if that thing actually WORKED lol probably would've taken just one of them to take out Dresden.
     
  3. TiredOldSoldier

    TiredOldSoldier Ace

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    452
    The second plane looks much smaller than the monster in the first pic. The first pic looks modern though all the equipment laround it ooks vintage. Wonder what the tail weel is for, possibly to prevent the tail hitting the runway if the initial climb angle was too steep.

    This is very intersting I'd always believed the ANT-20 was as far as they went, has anyone any more info, tried to follow the links but got nowhere.

    BTW I thing the multi engined between the wars designs were because the best available engines of the the time were in the 600HP range, give a 2200Hp R-3350 and they would use fewer of them.
     
  4. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    Makes the Spruce Goose look like a Spitfire....:eek:
     
  5. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Actually, I think it's two different planes. The one on the bottom is a K-7 bomber.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Kalinin K-7 - bomber, passenger

    SPECIFICATIONS:

    CREW 12
    PASSENGERS 128
    ENGINE 7 x M34F, 550kW
    WEIGHTS
    Take-off weight 38000 kg 83776 lb
    Empty weight 24400 kg 53793 lb [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]DIMENSIONS[/FONT]
    Wingspan 53.0 m 173 ft 11 in
    Length 28.0 m 91 ft 10 in
    Wing area 454.0 m2 4886.81 sq ft
    PERFORMANCE
    Max. speed 234 km/h 145 mph
    Cruise speed 180 km/h 112 mph
    Ceiling 4000 m 13100 ft
    Range 3030 km 1883 miles


    I believe the one on the top was built from "secret" plans in an archives.
     
  6. zippo

    zippo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    16
    If you look closely at the first picture it appears to be computer generated. Look at the soft lines around the structures and the background.
     
  7. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    I was more looking at the lack of detail in the background, it looks like off.
     
  8. machine shop tom

    machine shop tom Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    44
    How many miles would the take-off roll for either plane be?

    Good thing the Russia was so roomy at the time.

    tom
     
  9. TiredOldSoldier

    TiredOldSoldier Ace

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    452
    Definetly computer generated look at this
    [​IMG]

    Must admit they fooled me. They must have added these since I visited that site, worth a look as a couple are really funny

    http://englishrussia.com/?p=2231
     
  10. zippo

    zippo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    239
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ha! The structural integrity of that aircraft is amazing!
     

Share This Page