Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Gliders

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by Ron, Nov 21, 2000.

  1. Ron

    Ron Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2000
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sounds to me like Gliders were not the best ways of getting into combat. Was the only reason they used Gliders because they didn't have enough Paratrooper divisions? It seems to me like the Glider troops suffered the most accidental deaths even compared to the paratroops.
    Would anyone else like to add anything about gliders...FEEL FREE PEOPLE HAVN'T BEEN VERY TALKATIVE HERE LATELY. [​IMG]

    <FONT COLOR="#ff0000" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">This message has been edited by Ron on 21 November 2000 at 09:55 PM</font>
     
  2. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    I'm not sure, but I know that paratroops get strewn pretty far over an area, even if they are in the same stick, (from the same plane). A glider will place a bunch of troops in the exact same location. This means that the combat effectiveness is greater than a bunch of out of contact individuals. The are risks using either method of insertion, especially if the enemy is expecting you with such treats as Rommel Asparagus. But when the enemy doesn't really expect an airborne invasion, gliders can place a concentrated force in a specific location very safely, as happened at Eben Emael.
     
  3. Jackson

    Jackson Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2000
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Glider Infantry usually suffered heavy losses. This was usually do to:

    1) Enemy Fire on the way down
    2) Crap on the ground like Large sharp sticks to cut through the gliders
    3) They weren't specially trained.

    The glider troops were regular infantry. They had no special training, and they weren't even payed jump/hazard pay like the Airborne.

    ------------------
    "Goddamn it, you'll never get the Purple Heart hiding in a foxhole! Follow me!"
    - Captain Henry P. "Jim" Crowe (Guadalcanal, January 13, 1943)
     
  4. Mussolini

    Mussolini Gaming Guru WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2000
    Messages:
    5,739
    Likes Received:
    563
    Location:
    Festung Colorado
    Not to mention trees, rocks, roads, fences, ponds, soft groud/hard ground, and uneven ground. They were also hard to steer and then safely land. The parts were made from all over the US so werent top-quality or fit perfectly.

    Thats my 2 cence worth

    ------------------
    Mussolini

    "Blood alone moves the Wheels of history." Benito Mussolini.

    "What the proletariat needs is a bath of blood." Benito Mussolini, speech in Milan, July 22, 1919

    "Liberty is a duty, not a right"
    --Benito Mussolini
     
  5. Richard Murphy

    Richard Murphy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2000
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    But, has already been said, they did have the advantage of landing as a unit, armed and ready to go.
    And you're partially wrong, 22nd Luftlande Division (Which supported the Fallschirmjäger in their heyday.) was specially trained for the task, and many recruits were taken in from them when the paratroop arm was expanded in 1942-43.

    Regards from the Park,

    Rich
     
  6. Jackson

    Jackson Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2000
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was referring to the U.S. Glider Infantry. I wasn't aware that Germany even had Glider Inf. Units.

    ------------------
    "Goddamn it, you'll never get the Purple Heart hiding in a foxhole! Follow me!"
    - Captain Henry P. "Jim" Crowe (Guadalcanal, January 13, 1943)
     
  7. COMET

    COMET Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2000
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    They Did! The first gliders operations were mada by germans gliders over Holland and Belgium.

    The idea was good and it's always used by modern armies, with Helicopters instead of gliders.

    In Normandy, gliders were essential, because they didn't have enought planes for paratroopers, on the other hand operations like Pegasus Bridge needed a mean like the glider...

    I am a fan of gliders operations!

    Comet
     
  8. mart

    mart Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    0
    the only reason Gliders were used were the lack of Dakota's and the need for light artillery guns/ AT guns and jeeps for the lightly armed units.

    The Germans used gliders for the reason of getting somewhere undetected, since a glider can be unhooked from a plane before that plane is seeable or hearable by the enemy.
    Gliders then silently arrive at their destination so that surprise is complete (see german attack on Eben Emael for isntance
     
  9. PzJgr

    PzJgr Drill Instructor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Jefferson, OH
    I agree with Comet. The main advantage over Paratroop drops would be the ability to drop artillery and jeeps with the troops. I also believe paratroop casualty rates were high regardless of what country

    ------------------
    Tschuss
     
  10. Wittmann

    Wittmann Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2001
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pzjgr is wright I think, but he forgets the airborne tanks (also used in Normandy). The allies had the tetrach and it was used by the british troops
     
  11. WALT

    WALT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good question, and I dont know the answer, but a couple of thoughts come to mind right away (1) Glider Infantry reguires no special training, if time is emportant (2) no extra, or special equipment would be required by the troops..... I think what it may have boiled down to, is when an operation was planed and it became apparent that the operation would not work unless three things could be accoumplished:surprise,cut off enemey retreat route,and maybe the most important one: seal off routes that could be used to reinforse the enemy.Under normal conditions paratroopers would be inserted behind the enemy postion, but if they were not availible for whatever reson, then normal Infantry could be tranfered to the "glidders", and without delay could be deployed. I think the use of glidders proved to be very risky at best, but if the need outweighted that risk, then they were used. However, the Glidder Infantry went by the wayside as did the "tank destroyer" units because as a whole, the cost ( in lives)was to much. I belive, on paper, it sounded like an easy way to supplament the airborne troops, but was done awy with as it became practical to do so.
     
  12. Smoke286

    Smoke286 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2001
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jackson you are wrong about Glider troops being regular infantry and not being specially trained, at least in the British Army, On of the most famous airbourne operations of WW II Operation Pegasus was undertaken by units of the 2nd Ox and Bucks a gliderbourne infantry batt.specially trained assault troops designed to capture a bridge, just as the mission called for. The first glider came to a stop less then 20 yards from the target, all the men inside were knocked out! Yet they recovered, and the vital bridge was in their hands within 4 minutes of touchdown. They then held it till the arrival of Commandos from Sword beach around midday when they were relieved. The bridge in question was prepared with explosives and would have been destroyed had a less rapid assault tactic been used. Gliders biggest weakness was that a suitable landing point had to be found very close to the objective, and as such were easy to defend against
     
  13. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    I's also have to say that the german glider-borne troops that conquered the Belgian fort Eban Emael, we fallschirmjeager. The were lead by the famous Otto Skorzeny, (the same man who led the team that rescued Mussolini).

    German Fallschirmjeager, (paratroops), were very weel trained, especially at the begining of the war.

    I think that the US's style of using regular troop as a glider assault force was unique to that army. As far as I know, everyone else used well, trained paras in their gliders.
     
  14. WALT

    WALT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Smoke & Otto...Good points...I stand corrected.
     
  15. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Walt, you weren't wrong by any means. I'm of the belief that the size of the operation dictates the troops and equipment involved.

    Eben Emael was was a small op. just about 15 gliders took, place. The troops needed to be specially trained combat engineers with the tools and demolitions eqipment to destroy a fort as quickly as possible.

    D-Day and Market Garden gliders troop were to land and sit tight until support arrived. No real specialized equipment, nor training was needed for these tasks. As well, the sheer scale of these two ops made training all the thousands of men much more difficult than the hundred or so at Eben Emael assault or the Gran Sasso raid, (the Mussolini rescue).

    As smoke said, even within these larger Allied glider operations there were specialized troops with specific tasks to perform. But I think it is safe to say that many of the glider troop were 'filler', included to add mass to the entire attack.

    In short, Walt you are actually right, but just about large Allied, (US), glider ops, and not all glider operations.

    [ 19 May 2002, 10:17 AM: Message edited by: Otto ]
     
  16. WALT

    WALT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks Otto.....Heres a couple of tid-bits from the "what its worth department".....Mr. "HEINZ" of pickle fame wanted to do his share in the war effort, so volenteered to convert one of his factorys to build U.S. Gliders for the Normandy invasion. I have heard somewhere tha the British Gliders were of a better design than the American ones.
     
  17. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    That's interesting, I'd love to compile a book of quirky WW2 fact like that.
     
  18. Mussolini

    Mussolini Gaming Guru WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2000
    Messages:
    5,739
    Likes Received:
    563
    Location:
    Festung Colorado
    The Gliders got troops in concerntration where they landed. This wasnt always good though. Many men drowned when their gliders landed in lakes or ponds. In Normandy, the hedgerows were higher then previously thought to be, giving them less room to land. Many times they would go through the hedgerow, if not clip it. The GLiders were easily riped apart and flipped over a lot.
     
  19. Affentitten

    Affentitten Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    The reasons for glider troops have all been outlined above. Some debate seems to exist though about how specialised these men were.

    In the American divisions, the glider troops were all drawn from regular units or airborne regiments in training. They had no choice about being in the glider infantry and initially received no extra pay or recognition (like the right to wear jump insignia). This caused a lot of bitching. The pilots too were all guys who had been drafted wholesale from army aviation classes. They had joined up wanting to fly fighter planes and suddenly found themselves guiding unpowered aircraft into crash landings.

    In the British army, the "Airlanding" units were also culled from regualr infantry (such as 7 KOSB at Arnhem). This was in response for the need to beef up the airborne divisions but without the need for jump training and more planes to drop them out of. Some units, like Major Howards D Coy, 6 Ox & Bucks received extra training for specific missions that was at least the equal of the specialist Ranger, Commando etc preparation. All these glider infantry got token extra pay.

    The big difference between the British and American units was the pilots. British glider pilots were trained to fight as infantry, whereas their American colleagues were not, and were generally a hindrance once on the ground.

    Somebody mentioned comparing the gliders themselves. The British Horsa could carry about 30 men, or a 75mm howitzer and a jeep to tow it. It was made of plywood and was much bigger and heavier than the main American glider, the Waco. That could carry about 18 men and was made from fabric stretched over a metal skeleton.

    Statistically, more Wacos were recoverable for re-use after operations than the more brittle Horsas, which tended to smash up a lot. But I believe the Wacos had a much higher casualty rate, mainly due to the very inferior training the American pilots got. Early in the war, many of the clipped-wing pilots got their first Waco flight on the way to their first mission.
     
  20. Smoke286

    Smoke286 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2001
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    MART, as stated here by other, the lack of availability of Dakotas aside the real reason for the inception of glider troops was to get complete units on site ready to immediatly do battle, not scattered all over hells creation in dribs and drabs
     

Share This Page