bombings in Belgium

No : Japan is not taking immigrants and the economic situation in Japan is not worse than in the US ,although Japan also has a negative birth figure .

 

No :it is the big majority wee need to focus on,because without the support,sympathy, connivance of this big majority, the small minority of terrorists are powerless .

During WWII we did not fight against the nazis,but against the Germans :without the support,sympathy,connivance of the Germans, the nazis were powerless .

And because of this support, sympathy, connivance we were obliged to kill a lot of Germans to defeat the nazis . There was the air attack on Cologne, but the sympathy,support,connivance for the nazis did not disappear, than there was Hamburg,and still no results, finally there was Dresden .

And after the war the Germans whined, but "forgot" that it was their attitude that made Cologne, Hamburg, Dresden ,..necessary .

Now,we are faced by an other enemy who enjoys the support, sympathy,connivance of his civilians,and again, we must hurt and attack the civilians, till they stop their sympathy, support, connivance for those who attack us .

Mao said : the terrorist will succeed as long as he is as a fish in the water .Thus,we must attack the water . In the second phase of the South African War, the Boers started a guerilla war and they had the support, sympathy and connivance of the civilians . When there were no longer civilians to support them (they were locked up in camps), the Boers gave up .

We must do the same . We must terrorize the terrorists and those who support them . If we don't, we lose .

 

The big majority in Europe are the native born Europeans. Are you suggesting that they support, sympathize, etc with the terrorist?

 

And just how are you going to identify those sympathetic,supportive and conniving civilians that you want to attack and hurt?

 

Again, maybe you missed this. Do the math on your investments:

and this:





What math are you using?

 

Where some of you are making mistakes is by looking at unemployment as a %. I don't have the EU stats, but in the US during much of the so called recovery, unemployment went down while the workforce also went down. Jobs being created are low wage and higher labor intensive jobs which older workers can't/won't take.

This article using IMF data shows the long term potential. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/20/imf-refugee-influx-provide-eu-economic-boost

This article is a gold mine. At a glance it discusses the short-run costs. Then subtly in the article is a Kensyian's paradise. Govt spending boosting GDP:
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/20/imf-refugee-influx-provide-eu-economic-boost

Again, the refugee situation is an answer to economic chaos down the road as an answer the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about. Could also be helped by tax cuts and incentives to produce more babies.

 

There are plenty of people in the Middle East that could be taken in with low risk. Specifically, Kurds, Yazidis and Christians, who are also the populations at highest risk in their homelands.

 

Agreed and let countries decide who they want to recruit.If migration is for the benefit of the importing country then surely they should (and I know this next phrase is is setting me up, but what the heck) head hunt to fill the vacancies and not be overrun by a mob no one has control over.

I seem to remember back in the day when migrants moved for humanitarian reasons, not just financial ones.

Brian

 

as i said, the arabs bureid their girls alive,

the terrorism is in thier blood.

look at ME, for example, compare Armenia with Iraq, why there is no terrorist attacks in Armenia?

because there is no arabs in Armenia.

unforchantly, IRAN is led by Arab lovers (Slaves, indeed).

i have many things to say...but...

did you know in Pahlavi period, you have to visit Iran first, then arabic countries?

but now, iranians spent milions dollars in enemy countries, without visiting thier country first

Pahlavi`s motto was "God, King, Country", but currently is "Arabs, Arabs, Arabs"

these arabs killed over 300,000 of best sons of iran, in IIW, and thousands before that,

why are now called "brothers" and "friends" ?

ect...

if 1979 uprising was deafeted, IIW would last less than 1 month...

ز شیر شتر خوردن و سوسمار --- عرب را به جایی رسانیده است کار​

​

که تاج کیانی کند آرزو --- تفو باد بر این چرخ گردون، تفو​

 

Yazidis are originally Zoroastrian.

they were muslimed after 7 years war with arab forces under "sheikh oday" full name "شرف‌الدین ابوالفضائل عدی بن مسافر بن اسماعیل بن موسی بن مروان بن حسن بن مروان" "Sharaf -o- ddin Abolfazaael, Oday ibn Mosafer ibn Esmaeel ibn Mousa ibn Marvan ibn Hasan ibn Marvan".

the Yazidian army was led by "سپهبد مهرداد" and "تیربد فرخ روز" Espahbod Mehrdad and Tirbod (Commander of Archers, who was second in command of an army.) Farrokh Rooz.

Espahbod Mehrdad was killed in action, and Tirbod Farrokh Rooz became prisoner. the arabs burnt him and around 300 of prisoners, alive in fire.

 

Here in the US we've had more terrorist incidents due to non Arab Americans than due to Arab Americans. Great Britain has historically had a far worse problem with those from the British Isles than elsewhere. Of the terrorist attacks by Moslems who have immigrated to the US most have not been Arabs: The Boston bombers were from the Chechnyans, others have been from Pakistan or even are of European decent. Attributing all terrorist or even all Islamic terrorist actions to Arabs is simply not accurate.

 

YES

 

That is certainly contrary to all the news reports and every other source of information I have. Why do you think a population that is mostly Christian that has been living in Europe for centuries supports or sympathizes with terrorist attacks aimed at them?

 

every muslim has an arabic genome in his blood,

every muslim is a timed bomb,

islam`s language is arabic

and they can kill non muslims (first) and other muslims (second) by direct order(s) of Allah, like one i`ve sent yesterday to go to heaven or what they say "بهشت" Behesht or in arabic: "جنت" Jannat, comes from جن Janna, means Unseen. and jannat means a place you can`t see with your eyes. so you must die to go there and see it.

 

Wrong answer : I did not say that the situation in Japan was good : I said that it was not worse than in the US (where there are still a lot of immigrants) : the Japanese economy has not collapsed, neither are millions of Japenese unemployed, thus the theory that a continuous immigration is needed to avoid economic collaps, is wrong .

Last year, more than a million immigrants entered Germany and also last year, the number of unemployed in Germany went up by 140000.

The reason is that taxes went up to finance immigration and that people had less money to spend,which resulted in more unemployed .
Europe can not afford a continous immigration, especially not from Muslims .

 

The islam comes from KSA or what called by Sasanids "دشت سواران" Dasht -e Savaran means Raiders Valley.

so it`s basically arab.

 

Absolutely untrue.

 

We can't : they must identify themselves as those who are not sympathetic,supporting,etc to the terrorists .
After the capture of Abdeslam and the attacks there were 3 cases where Muslims from Brussels showed openly their support for the terrorists and where the other Muslims remained silent = unwilling to condemn those who openly supported the terrorists .

 

The big majority are born in Europe but not Europeans, besides : there is no European nation .

The Turks living in Europe consider themselves as Turkish citizens, not as Germans,etc .. During the Turkish presidential election campaign ,Erdogan went to Europa to have the votes of the Turks living in Europe,and overall he was welcomed enthusiastically .

Afaics ,the Mexicans living in the US do not participate in the Mexican elections .


One can not be German, Belgian,etc and Turk I

 

I am very sceptical about the Kurds : yesterday in Afschaffenburg (Germany) a group of demonstrating Turks were attacked by Kurds .