Command of the Eastern Front

I always felt there was only one man who should have been the commander in chief of the Eastern Front that man Eric Von Manstein if he had this post and a free hand without Hitler butting in the outcome could well have been different.

 

Depends on the point of view. IMHO things were very well as they should be

 

True everyone has a different view why I made this decision the over all chief of the eastern front Manstein under him would be the three army group commanders so why did I select Manstein well I read a lot of books on the Generals and Field Marshals and he stood out even the real experts feel he was there best after all after the war and when Manstein was released from prison he went on to become a military advisor for the west German army.

 

Maybe Manstein could have handled it, maybe not. At least he knew how to give the enemy a hard time...


(Personally I think the Soviet Army should have continued its 1938 policy of ending officer careers short...Why did you stop it Stalin?)

 

You know, I wasn't realy thinking of stopping, actually I got a bit sidetracked with a slight rebalance of the number of Jewish doctors and old checkists for a breather when these idiots from the west decided to call in. Anyway, as soon as I saw them off was I then able to whittle down a few more marshalls...

 

I see....minor disturbances in the west 1941-45. Too bad you yourself had your career stopped before you could get on with the next( =last? ) round of enemies of the nation.

-------

Churchill said: "I collect the jokes people tell about me". "That's a coincidence - said Stalin, - I collect the people who tell jokes about me!"

 

Field marshal Von Manstein was certainly the best strategist and master of the field the Germans had in WWII, no doubt.

However, Manstein was a typical megalomaniac Prussian general traumatised with Von Clausewitz's theories about war: it is brute force and violence, not resistance, the main ingredients of victory. That kind of thought was still there, the poor German economy was also there, as well as the caothic structures of a totalitarian State, the typical German disregard for logistics, the anti-utilitarian and anto-practical war objectives in Hitler's mind…

Manstein wouldn't have wasted men and matériel the way Hitler did, but maybe he would have done so in the way Ludendorff did in 1917-1918…

 

Yes Hitler was not keen on the Prussian generals, as for Manstein I think some of those poor mistakes may not had happen.

 

Well, Hitler did have the choice back in 1934 to make Röhm and SA the main structure of the future German army. I guess Hitler did the wise choice here even if it was the hated Prussian vons etc...

 

Hitler made alot of mistakes, and should have let his generals fight on the Eastern Front without butting in and changing their plans. Stalin's Great Purge of Russian officers didnt help him either.

 

It seems even in the most difficult situations Hitler did not get the information he would have needed , but lies...??

-----------

Heinz Guderian was interviewed by Basil Liddell Hart after the war for his book The Other Side of the Hill (1948)

On December 20th, 1941, I had a five hours' discussion with Hitler at his headquarters in East Prussia, in order to inform him of the situation of the and Panzer Army under my command. The mission given to this army was to encircle
Moscow from the south and south-west, and then to push forward to Gorki (300 miles beyond Moscow). In view of the condition of the troops and the supply possibilities this task could not be fulfilled.

I tried to convince Hitler of the correctness of my report - but without success. I got the impression that the reports from the front did not reach him unaltered, and suggested to him that he should relieve the officers of his operational staff and appoint officers with fresh experience from the front line. After tile audience, Hitler told Keitel: "This man, I have not convinced."

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERguderian.htm

 

Over the winter I have read three books on the war that I have really enjoyed. One was on Stalingrad, one on the Falise pocket and one on the Market-Garden Allied operation. In all of these books the German high command and Hitler are charecterized by delusional thinking and dicision making. The staff officers and aides sent to gather information are ignored on their return. Bad news is charecterized as coming from a defeatest traitor or from Allied spies that have infiltrated the communication network. The general feeling I got was not quite that they shot the messengers that brought bad news but they would certainly use selective hearing. Put on top of this Hitler's dogged insistance that he would rather throw away entire armies rather than retreat and you have a perfect recipe for an allied victory.

 

The Master Race, Propaganda, Arrogance, hatred, Pride.

It's incredible how German forces in Russia were able to operate, Hitler had lost the war by his own sub arrogance and delusion.

 

In many situations Hitler was presented with the info but either chose to ignore it or was shouted down. However I dont buy the Assertions that are some of the German Generals memoirs that they knew what was best but were held back by the rantings of a raving lunatic. There is a pattern to the memoirs, take credit for the successes and blame Hitler for the failures.

Manstein may have been a good Commander in Chief East but I'm not so sure he would have changed the course of the war. But if any German Commander was to take charge then Manstein was probably the ablest.

 

Gotthard, the generals had their bacon to save so naturally they piled all the faults on top of the obvious target, who could not defend himself anyway. The Other Side of the Hill is a strange book, where the German generals seem quite happy to spread their "not me, I knew better" view, aided by an author quite happy to hear them say what he wanted to hear.

 

well then lets just thank god he wasnt in command.

 

I didn't quite catch your drift...

 

I think he means thank god von Manstein wasn't the commander in chief or else historical events might have played out very differently.

 

Not sure about that, I suspect there would had been a lot less bad decisions made and the war may had dragged on a little longer.

 

Not sure about that, I suspect there would had been a lot less bad decisions made and the war may had dragged on a little longer. </font>[/QUOTE]Yeah I agree with you Richard, I was just explaining what Eagle was trying to say.