As always here I am holding your hand, facts here is the fact source. Being a little more careful with those that KNOW the history of the topic may be good advice. Have you every heard of "58 or Bust", a plan to invade British Columbia and link Washigton State with Alaska? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 12_pf.html http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p121_HNAC.html
No source is beyond criticism, Mutant Poodle, and no knowledge is absolute. We cannot discuss things reasonably unless we accept that no single written source holds a monopoly of truth.
Well, thank you Roel, wow never thought of that argument. I put the FACTS in front of you and you come up with this? I expected more than a reply like this. You are right about the criticism though, you are very good at it.
Personal attacks are not permitted Forum Rules Yes, this is a warning - you have been persistantly rude towards several members recently. As an ex-moderator, frankly you should know better.
This is not personal and I am sick of you threatening me. You say nothing about Roel. Dont try to build a case Ricky this is not a sand box political debate here. Name them, ROEL MAKES STATEMENTS WITHOUT PROVIDING HIS SOURCES and I don't loke it, no one does. If Roel cannot defend his position then thats his problem. Roel is good at criticism, how is that a personal attack, you have just crtiticised me, so what. Ricky, you have no right to interfer with opinion. Roeal bevaves badly towards most of my posts and before you got here there was a discussion about his attacks on someone else he could not succesffully debate. The "ex moderator" Roel knows dam well why I no longer a moderator, because of my cancer so BACK OFF! :angry:
1) I am asking you to keep within the Forum rules 2) making points about the poster rather than their argument is a personal attack 3) why you are an ex-moderator is immaterial - the point was that you should know better than to break forum rules. Mutant Poodle is now banned.
Under the new forum rules there is only one kind of banning, which is permanent. Mutant Poodle has been made aware of his violation of the Guidelines, which was in fact part of a sustained effort to discredit me in spite of my own attempts to clear things up by PM and posts here on the forums. He then decided to ignore his warning and continued to discredit Ricky as well; hence he was banned. On a personal note, I have always considered Mutant Poodle to be a valuable member and he has been a great help to me at times. But as a forum Admin I cannot allow people to show behaviour like this, especially after being warned about it.
this reminds me,,there was a guy in here,stalin ,i think ,very broken english[russki?] anyway he was going on about how stalin was good ,and he took care of his ppl, and won the war ect..stalin didnt really hurt anyone ,,western propaganda ect..he was basi8cally full of s#$%...but not being rude or anything ..then wham ,he got banned.is it possible to get banned for haveing a silly or foundless opinion,or did i just read it all wrong? sry ,i cant seem to find the room where it happined..
Just like Holocaust denial, rooting for Stalin is immoral and disrespectful to millions of dead human beings. If that is a member's only purpose on these forums then the Administration will see him removed.
To clarify slightly, if a member has as his fixed aim the promotion of an idea that is just plain wrong, like 'the holocaust did not happen', or 'Hitler was a benevolent man, kind to all living things' or whatever, and refuses to even listen to any evidence to the contrary, then the Admin will have a little chat with them. This might lead to them being banned, depending on what happens. I'm not disagreeing with Roel, just expanding on his point, as it could come across as a little draconian.