Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

PzKpfw II Ausf.D and E

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Skua, Feb 8, 2006.

  1. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Basically some curiosity coming from working on a kit, concerning the historic context of this AFV.

    I have some information in the 'Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two' by Chamberlaine/Doyle but it's not much and I don't know how much of it is correct ( this particular book have received a severe beating from a specific forum member which name shall go unmentioned here ;) ).

    But I guess I can say as much as the Ausf.D and E ( and what was the difference between the E and D ? ) were built as fast versions of the PzKpfw II, and that they were used in the Polish campaign. I have no information about any further service, but I understand the remaining tanks were at some point rebuilt as flamethrower tanks.
     
  2. shermanologist on watch

    shermanologist on watch New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PARIS-FRANCE
    via TanksinWW2
    From memory, the difference was the tracks used (the suspension being in both cases Christie) and their bad behavior during the Polish campaign was the reason for the conversion into flamethrower variants.
    They were not very successful during the early Russian campaign and most were turned into Panzerjaeger, with the excellent 76.2mm ex-Soviet field gun.
    Few Ausf.D and fewer (if any) Ausf.E (with lubrificated half-track type shoes IIRC) were made though.
    HTH
     
  3. David.W

    David.W Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Devon. England
    via TanksinWW2
    Skua.
    Aforementioned member should be well qualified to answer your question when he reads it.
     
  4. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    Aforementioned member does not usually refer to himself in the third person. ;)

    The credible references I have only refer to the Pz.Kpfw.II Ausf.D, so I would suspect that it is simply two names for the same vehilcle. I haven't been able to confirm this, though.

    It served as a basis for the Marder II with the russian 76.2 mm.
     
  5. Tiger of Kursk

    Tiger of Kursk New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2005
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
  6. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks, Tiger of Kursk.

    The first issue of Tanks & Armour describes the difference between the Ausf.D and Ausf.E being different sets of tracks. The tracks of the Ausf.E were fitted with rubber pads. That would mean that a change of tracks would change the designation of the vehicle as well, but it's the only plausible explanation I have found.
     
  7. Tankdriver phpbb3

    Tankdriver phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Moscow, Rus
    via TanksinWW2
    To my knowledge, from April 1942 till June 1943 Alketts and Vegmanns factorys were make 201 units of the Panzerjager 2 - 7.62cm PaK 36(r) auf Fgst Pz Kpfw 2 Ausf D1 und D2 (Sd Kfz 132); (isn't Marder 2). From June 1942 till June 1943 FAMO, MAN and Daimler-Benz factory were make 576 units (75 units were make over later) in Pz Jag "Marder 2" - 7.5cm PaK 40/2 auf Fgst Pz Kpfw 2 Ausf F (Sf) (Sd Kfz 131).
     

Share This Page