Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Tiger I hit by 75mm

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by BMG phpbb3, Mar 15, 2007.

  1. BMG phpbb3

    BMG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ontario Canada
    via TanksinWW2
  2. Anthax

    Anthax New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    That's a lucky one! :D
     
  3. David.W

    David.W Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Devon. England
    via TanksinWW2
    The B & W film that preceeds the interview has nothing to do with the incident however.

    That Tiger is now operational at the Tank Museum Bovington, Dorset, England.
     
  4. WO_Kelly

    WO_Kelly Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    via TanksinWW2
    If it was Tunsia the british churchill would have been armed with a 57mm 6 pounder ATG.
     
  5. David.W

    David.W Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Devon. England
    via TanksinWW2
    I heard that the Tiger was disabled by a 6 pounder anti tank gun.
     
  6. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    via TanksinWW2
    The unit credited with this victory is the 4th troop B Squadron 48th RTR of the 21st Tank Brigade, equipped with Churchills armed with a 6 pdr gun.
     
  7. David.W

    David.W Active Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Devon. England
    via TanksinWW2
    Then I stand corrected.
     
  8. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    The Brits actually field produced what a Churchill version known as the Churchill 75 NA. 75mm guns (from Shermans?) replaced the 57mm gun. A very useful expedient, and fairly sucessful.
     
  9. Siverous

    Siverous New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Australia, NSW, Gloucester.
    via TanksinWW2
    I agree it was sucessful good at killing Infantry and Light Armoured Tanks, Not to mention it's cheap.

    Which tiger as we talking about here, remember there was many diffrent Tigersm but one outclassed them all.
     
  10. FNG phpbb3

    FNG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Were there? I thought there were Earlies and Lates with very little difference between the two.

    I assume this is an early being from North Africa but it is hard to tell as the guys head is in the way of biggest giveaway, the turret view scope(s)

    FNG
     
  11. WO_Kelly

    WO_Kelly Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    via TanksinWW2
    Yeah I heard about those, but I didn't think any of the 75mms ever ran into a Tiger. On the other hand who the hell knows. Much better to be in a 6 pounder armed one though, at least you have a chance of frontal penetrations at 200m.
     
  12. Gerry Chester

    Gerry Chester WWII Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    4
    via TanksinWW2
    The story of sPzAbt.504's Tiger 131 is an interesting one.

    Despite being bagged by fire from a Churchill Mark III of 21st Tank Brigade's 48th
    Bn. Royal Tank Regiment, 25th Army Tank Brigade's REME was given the task of
    salvaging her - note difference in the titles of the two brigades.

    The decision to re-paint her green - at a shade close to the'Westeuropisches GrĂ¼n' as possible - was in response to a "suggestion" by Winston Churchill, doubtless stemming from the reversal of the decision to cease production of "his" tank. The records of Schwere Panzer Abteilungen indicate the sPzAbt.501 (Heavy Tank Battalion) lost so many tanks at Hunt's Gap that it ceased to be an effective fighting force, in part due to fire from Churchill 6-pdrs. The intention was to put 131, minus a turret number, on display as being one of the Tigers that took part in the battle.

    After being thoroughly examined by technical people and on display in
    London, she was donated to the Bovington Museum which restored and repainted
    her approximately to the original colour given upon arrival in Tunisia by
    her crew. Where the green paint came from in Tunisia is anyone's guess -
    possibly from the same source where the Germans found the brown paint for
    the Tigers of sPzAbt 504.

    For photographs see: http://www.northirishhorse.org/nih/Arti ... r-131.html

    Cheers, Gerry
     
  13. bosworth gannaway

    bosworth gannaway New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Different Tigers /

    It is reported earlier in this thread that the Tiger featured in the b&w footage preceding the colour clip of the damaged Tiger is not the same as the second one. That may be so, I do not know, but may I ask how the party making that claim knows ? Also, even if they are not the same tank, is it known what the situation was of the first Tiger, which certainly seems to take a hit immediately after firing it's main armament.
    BG
     

Share This Page