Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The Bat Bomb

Discussion in 'Aircraft' started by bracko87, Jul 21, 2018.

  1. bracko87

    bracko87 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Is this possible??



    Is this true or...???
     
  2. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,341
    Likes Received:
    5,701
    It was certainly tested.
     
  3. bracko87

    bracko87 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes, but did they ever use it? On Japan soil? On this video is saying they made some barracks in fire.
     
  4. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,341
    Likes Received:
    5,701
    Don't know about use in enemy territory, but they did start fires during tests. And with any wild animal they were unreliable.
     
    bracko87 and JJWilson like this.
  5. Fargo

    Fargo Active Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Various, as needed
    The bat bomb was never used operationally on Japanese soil. The weapon's effectiveness in a combat situation indeed can only be speculated from test information, but of course opinions on the matter will differ. Official reasons for cancelling the weapon's development include the infeasibility of creating a workable time table from weapon development to military implementation due to uncertainties inherent in the project, namely the bats' behavior. Jack Couffer, a member of the Project X-Ray team developing the bat bomb at the time, suggests that it was likely the promising results of atomic bomb testing that finally did the bat bomb project in.

    Sources
    Bat Bomb: World War II's Other Secret Weapon by Jack Couffer
     
  6. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Given that the Atomic Bomb cost 2 billion and the B-29 development and production cost 3 billion, I doubt that the Atomic Bomb was the reason the measly 2 million dollar project was cancelled. Especially, since there were doubts that the A-Bomb(Fat Man) would even work. Although there were probably many more doubts that the "Bat Bomb" would work.
     
  7. the_diego

    the_diego Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    82
    Could it be they stopped it due to mishaps during testing? Read somewhere the weapon was tested too near an army building. The bats roosted there and set it afire. At least we know it works!
     
  8. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    One issue they had was that if you released the bats too high up they froze from what I recall reading. I think they had to go under 10,000 ft and depending on the season perhaps considerably under that. May have had problems heat wise at altitude even prior to release.
     
  9. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,341
    Likes Received:
    5,701

Share This Page