Personally I don't care if you believe me or not. As it is when "You're lying" is the first rebuttal in a debate it's a good indicator of bias. Riverbend Cafe. I was a regular at the bar after golf. About three years back. Monopoly Guy was 5 foot nothing, bushy upturned pointed white moustache and had a navy sports coat on. Guy was a barfly. Came in every evening for his nightly after dinner drink he said. I was with my buddy Jess, a one eyed legal immigrant from El Salvadore. I'm a very engaging type of person IRL. Never knew any Blacks growing up. Worked with a couple of execs as clients and in the BSA. I drove into the hood as a clueless teen to get some cycle parts from a Black guy who I mechaniced and raced with for a few years but we never met socially. We had a Black brother and sister in our HS. 2500 in the school. 30% Italian. Did you know people from Sicily were not legally considered white in the US until 1920? l worked, ate with and played with a crew of illegal immigrants from 2010 - 2018. Saw much white on brown racism there. Nope, never met any Black racists but I'm sure they exist. I see White ones every day. Semantics seem very important to you. What, in your opinion, is the difference or connection between racism and implicit bias?
What are we debating? I'm just pointing out your track record. Remember, you once called an article that listed basic polling stats as "frightening", when asked why it was frightening you backed off stating "I admitted that the only thing I came away with when I flunked STAT 101 was skepticism." Your post are infused w/ such hyperbole lack of accuracy. According to you, your father is a "terrorist" remember? I can't help but laugh at the Riverbend Cafe, just 30 min from Seattle, WA. What an absolute shocker you live in that area! You are an SJW meme at this point. Well, obviously you do.
Born and raised in NY. Moved to the PNW wen I was 64. Where do you hail from? Who are you? If were not debating an issue, why do you reply to my posts? Does disparaging me make your pov's more valid to you? Terror by Rangers. War is hell. Deal with. Take it from it from a WWII Ranger researcher who heard it first hand. Unless when you say terrorist the only picture in your mind is a brown person. But you're not racist, I'm sure you picture Tim McVeigh.
And there it is! I point out some obvious gaps in logic using your very own quotes. One of the gaps being that you see everything through the lens of racism, and how do you respond? You insinuate that I'm a racist!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! My God, where is self awareness when you need it? I'm going to ask Otto for a rag-doll smiley, you've definitely earned one, over and over. I mean this is getting bad now.
OK, Mr. "WWII Ranger Researcher" I have a serious question for you. Were all US Army Rangers in WWII terrorists then?
i dont think those were tears. pretty sure it was a snowflake water hissy fit thrown by jussie bubby... because he is all about love:
"I'm curious. When was the last time you spoke with a Black person? Did you ever ride in a vehicle with a Black person?" lol...get out much? not sure how u view canada. worked on a job site near calgary and it was like the fooking united nations. my maintenance guy is black black. not jussie bubby black. the last shitty cab driver who nearly got us killed was black...hmmm.
by the way, enjoying this thread. thanks to admin/ commentors for shaping it into an entertaining streamlined hot mess. the best is yet to come. cheers
love the old videos. look at the electronics for keyboard (fair exchange) probably full of vacuum tubes and dials that go to 11.
I don't need to ask. You've already stated that you think US Army Rangers in WWII acted as terrorrists. I was just seeing if you had the stones to repeat it. I guess not.
No, never said all. Common tactic though when you have nothing of worth to add to a discussion. This ain't my first rodeo and there is probably a term that describes your form of forum communication. I've run into your type many times in other forums. Have fun, honey.
Neither did I. You should know me better than that. See my signature. Not surprising you see the context you want rather than what's actually said. You mean the type that holds you to your very own statements? I can see how dealing with those types would be frustrating to you. So, according to you what percentage of US Army Rangers in WWII were terrorists?
Crickets. As you've been brutalized (yet again), it's probably about time for you to call somebody a racist.
I tried, but it's hard to get something discernible that small. There are already hundreds to choose from which suit most any situation. I found a perfect one for wolley's argument which he has abandoned due to lack of coherence. R.I.P.
Emooji shmoo-gi, I don't know shit from Shinola about these new fangled emojis. Two simple questions for you two. Does Q want to undo the Constitution without a democratic process? Yes or No please. What side of the race war are you on? Black or white please. I've referenced two WWII idioms in keeping with the purpose of the forum.