|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,562
Threads: 15,641
Posts: 195,478
Online: 234
Newest Member:
hinrey_2 |
|
|
| Quiz Me! This is the place to test your knowledge of WWII & military history. Quizzes have rules, make sure you read the rules and follow them before participating. |

January 5th, 2004, 09:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 515
|
|
Damn I knew that was way to easy  ...Bish, the floor is yours. [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
 Der große Stoß Büstenhalter auf Ihrem Kopf!!
|

January 5th, 2004, 08:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Norwich, but in excile in Catterick, N Yorkshire,
Posts: 762
|
|
I will get round to this. I posted a reply without thinking that all my books are in storage and as i've been away from the topic for so long i've forgotton almost everything. But i will think of something, even if its an easy one [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
'England confides that every man will do his duty' Nelson
'I'm a Norfolk man, and glory in being so' Nelson

Proud to be a GRUNT
|

May 6th, 2004, 09:03 AM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Seems it's time for a new question...
What were the two ways to disguise a Firefly among normal Shermans?
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

May 6th, 2004, 02:55 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Variously, the following were tried:
Underpainting of the lower portion of the gun barrel white to make it appear shorter. This was tried on a number of vehicles other than the Firefly as well.
Adding a false muzzle brake made of sheetmetal at about the point where the 75mm would end to make the gun appear shorter again.
Using camoflauge netting wrapped around the barrel to break up the outline of the gun making it blend into the background better. Nature abbhores a straight line.....
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

May 6th, 2004, 03:37 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Ok, all of these methods are similar, but there was another.
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

May 6th, 2004, 08:10 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Although it appears to be more rarely done, occasionally a 75mm Sherman was given a false gun barrel (the one's I've seen appear to be welded on alongside the real gun) to make the tank appear to be a Firefly. Of course, I'm sure most crews were readily willing to increase their likelihood of being targetted......
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

May 6th, 2004, 09:00 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
And yet there is another one. 
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

May 9th, 2004, 08:44 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
Are you still searching, T.A., or is it better to give the solution?
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

May 9th, 2004, 10:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern England
Posts: 256
|
|
Dummy barrel sticking out of the rear and the turret reversed.
|

May 10th, 2004, 02:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 394
|
|
Would it have something to do with camoflaguing the "addition" to the turret which took the recoil of the 17pdr, made the Firefly turret very distinctive.
(I cant imaging anyone wanting their Sherman to look like a Firefly, picked on first time)
__________________
Whe're off to see the Wizard, the wonderful wizard of OZ - 6 Australian Infantry Div, Bardia January 1941
|

May 10th, 2004, 03:32 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
m kenny is right. Despite T.A.'s answers (it's his turn so often), over to you.
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

May 16th, 2004, 07:52 AM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
As kenny seems not to want to...
could you continue, T. A.?
[ 16. May 2004, 03:04 AM: Message edited by: KnightMove ]
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

August 2nd, 2004, 04:29 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 571
|
|
*bump* TA, your turn man 
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
|

August 2nd, 2004, 04:00 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Alright, an "easy" one. What is the Kromuskit system?
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

August 2nd, 2004, 05:34 PM
|
 |
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,163
|
|
There's very little info on the web. A recoilless rifle?
__________________
If someone tries to remove the speck in your right eye, will you turn to him the other also?
|

August 2nd, 2004, 07:26 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Be a bit more specific.
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

August 2nd, 2004, 07:36 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,034
|
|
Hmmmmmmmmm... A recoiless Mortar??? A kinda WW2 LAWS???
"In the U.S., inventors Kroger and Musser formed the basis for the shape of U.S. recoilless rifle developments in their Kromuskit design. This design was superior to both the German designs and the Burney rifles in that the driving band featured the rifling already on it, unlike the previous designs which forced a copper ring into the rifling to impart spin. Thus, less gas pressure was to be had and by consequence, the weapon could be made lighter."
"During WWII, US Army ordnance developed a
recoilless 60mm mortar. Intended as a direct-fire weapon, it got around the two problems of drop-firing and
recoil by using (A) a small solid-fuel rocket on
the nose of the bomb, pointing forward, and (B)
a rear-mounted venturi system similar to the
75mm "Kromuskit" RR. The drill was as follows;
1. Place bomb in muzzle (in "hang" position)
2. Attach (8-foot) firing lanyard to rocket,
remove safety pin, step back
3. Yank lanyard, igniting rocket
4. Rocket thrust pushes bomb back into tube
(hard) and onto fixed firing pin
5. Bomb propellant (the traditional shotgun
cartridge arrangement) fires, launching
bomb out muzzle, and
6. Blast of gas comes out venturi, giving
recoilless effect.
Reportedly, the Infantry School took one look at
it- and odered production of the 57mm recoilless
rifle be given top priority instead.
More to the point, we have had "direct-fire
mortar"- type weapons in service since 1942.
Bazookas, 3.5in rocket launchers, M72 LAW,
AT-4, SMAW, etc."
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

August 2nd, 2004, 07:46 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Well, Red, you managed to hit it with the shotgun approach. Simply put it was the US recoilless rifle system like Britain's Burney system or the Bohler system of Germany (developed into production by Krupp and Rhinemetall) or, the granddaddy of them all the Davis system of WW 1.
The reason it came to be called Kromuskit was a result of a concatonation of the two designer's names as a corporate trade name.
Your turn.
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

August 2nd, 2004, 08:22 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,034
|
|
An easy one...
Which country used the Lahti-Salonranta LMG???
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

August 3rd, 2004, 06:07 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Finland and China ?
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

August 3rd, 2004, 08:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kildare, Ireland
Posts: 151
|
|
Hope this picture comes out:
Lahti/Saloranta m/26 LMG
An L/S model 26 with shoulder strap and a stack of extra 20-round magazines. Picture from the factory brochure
Finland!
__________________
A good plan violently executed today is better than a perfect plan executed tomorrow.
Patton
The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations.
David Friedman
Military justice is to justice what military music is to music.
Groucho Marx
|

August 3rd, 2004, 09:25 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,034
|
|
Finland,
Martin got in there first Maverik, Sorry...
RED
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

August 3rd, 2004, 10:46 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,004
|
|
Very quick one.....the RAF had major problems trying to fit 20mm cannon to Spitfires during the Battle of Britain - the guns wouldn't 'feed' properly.
What was the basic cause of the problem ?

__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

August 3rd, 2004, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 6,120
|
|
Ammo available was 25mm 
__________________
No Rest for the Wicked!
|

August 3rd, 2004, 03:18 PM
|
|
| |