I've seen a series of photos that look like this one and the tigers had the 'Das Reich' motif on them. Wrong angle here so I cannot see if they have the same. Plus, the camo speaks waffen SS.

__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!

the Panzer regiment during Kursk of Das Reich camo was not as bold as these Pzjgr, more stripping mish mash.....checked through several sources. Possibly Totenkopf's (th Kompanie but it also maybe GD's and not even at Kursk

E

Hmm. Good points. Gave it a shot. My eye is not what it used to be. [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]

__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!

Found this as same website. similiar camo scheme. This one belongs to the special battalion 505. At least that what the pic says. Could be same? Note the motif on the leftside of turret.

__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!

I´ll check on that Tiger but like you said Erich might not even be at Kursk because I just took it from the net as a "nicer Tiger pic" here.

Anyway more pics:





And more interesting pics:

http://www.panzer.punkt.pl/artykuly/...sk-galeria.htm

__________________

Although not anymore historically valid excellent pics/drawings of the Prokhorovka battle:

!!!!

http://www.angelfire.com/nm/duga/duga.htm

__________________

sPzAbt 505, Heavy Tank Battalion 505, part of Model's 9th Army.

(Za Rodinu back from the dead! )

__________________
Everly Brothers - What I Have To Do Is Dream
"Never wrestle with pigs, you both end up getting dirty and the pig likes it."

To further flesh out Za's correct reply a bit- According to Restayn (Tiger I on the Eastern Front) this photo was taken in early July in preparations for the Kursk offensive. The Tiger belonged to the 3rd company of the 505th.
Another photo- which shows the same horses (ok, that's a guess, but it looks pretty obvious!) also shows (theoretically only a few yards away) Tiger #300 of the same unit, which was commanded by a Lt. Roder.

According to Schneider in TiC I, this was the last delivery of late production Tiger Is the unit would recieve.

Although Schneider suggests that few if any Tigers from this unit were total losses during Zitadelle, the combat diary Schneider presents does note that by 8th July, only 3 tanks were still operational.

[img]graemlins/salute.gif[/img]

__________________
Seriously, all today is missing is free cotton candy and the annual Bay State Hooker Parade to make it any better.

Found this site back in Aug -02

http://www.geocities.com/armysappersforward/kursk.htm

It´s excellent so wanted to tell about it to our newer members!

__________________

Kiitos Kai-Petri,
The Mine-Countermine Report is superb.

__________________
“It’s the unconquerable soul of man, not the nature of the weapon he uses, that insures victory.”

The Ninth Army possessed a sufficiency of panzers for operation Citadel, but nowhere near enough infantrymen.The 9th Army entered the battle for Kursk with only 68,747 combat troops. Each of Model´s infantry divisions averaged a "ration" strength of 11,134 and a "trench" strength of 3,296 as compared to Army group South, which had an average ration strength of 17,369 and a trench strength of 6,344.

The 7,223 casualties suffered on 5 July eliminated over 20% of the available infantry in the main attack sector. Model had to change tactics on 6 July whether he wanted or not. The Army having exceeded 10,000 casualties by dawn on 7 July, Model found himself in the unusual tactical situation of being better able to afford tank losses than dead or wounded grenadiers.

Hitler´s commander by S Newton

__________________

Good posts on this battle, the threads still going after 4 years.......

There seems to be new facts and figures coming out on the battle all the time, such as Nipes version of it.

Perhaps the battle can best be described as a very costly tactical loss but an strategic win for the Soviets.
As for losses, who knows, they vary so much it's hard to get a grip on the true figures.

Soviet losses have been claimed as low as 200 or as high as 822 tanks, but the loss records now show that they were probably between 150 and 300 complete losses, with a similar number damaged. Likewise, German loss claims have reached as low as 80 or into the hundreds, including "dozens" of Tigers.

Any ideas on total armour losses for the whole battle, not just Prokhorovka.

The Russians took control of the field, so I suppose that could repair quite a few of their tanks, while the Germans had to leave most behind.

Would Citadel have succeeded for the Germans if it was launched on May 4th, as originally planned?

I think it was the only possibility to win this battle to start it as early as possible as the weather allowed. However the Soviets had a month to recover from the Manstein´s strike so it is possible the attack would not succeed earlier either.

__________________

Yes, I think that if it did go ahead earlier, it would probably still have failed.

After having the German attack confirmed by the Lucy spy ring, Stalin and some of the Red Army Stavka wanted to strike first. But the majority of the Stavka, and notably Zhukov, advised waiting for the Germans to exhaust themselves in their attack first. Zhukov's opinion swayed the argument. [thank God]

The lead up to the operation was a complete shambles from the German side, and this time it seems it was the Generals, not Hitler that were the main offenders.

Hitler seemed to have cold feet at this stage, and wasn't sure what to do, Manstein wanted the 'Backhand ' operation, but this meant giving up hard won ground, something Hitler loathed, and then Chief of Staff Zeitzler put forward cutting off the Kursk salient, which Hitler agreed to and wanted to move by May 4th.

But then the Generals such as Guderian, who's objections were at the strategic level, whether Germany should attack at all, not whether the plan itself was sound, and latter Model, who kept arguing against it, made Hitler delay it until June 12, and finally until July 4 in order to allow more time for new weapons to arrive from Germany, especially the new Panther tanks.

Would the strengths for the Kursk front of about 900,000 Germans with 2,700 tanks, 2,000 aircraft vs the Russians 1,300,000 men 3,600 tanks and 2,400 aircraft be close?

Still can't find accurate losses though.

I am not sure but I´d think the Soviet numbers should be greater. The reserves for the attacks behind Orel and Belgorod should be counted in as they had a decisive role in the later phases in July even though did not take part in the fighting in the beginning of Zitadelle.

__________________

Greetings gentlemen ! at the risk of getting thumped verbally by all all of you do know where Nipes (version) came from correct ?

pick up a copy and be enlightened from George his info is not knew but came from German sources right after the failed battle attempt with the SS panzerkorps

Erich I dont know please inlighten me

__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

Geroge Nipes " Decision in the Ukraine, Summer 1943, II SS and III Panzerkorps"

copyright 1996.

George took a big gamble when he published his work especially about the Kursk battle which threw every Soviet/US historian into a tizzy as to actual German losses in the southern Salient.

his background for the Kursk work was Sylvester Standlers excellent work "Die Offensive gegen Kursk", 232 pages, 78 photos with many used by Nipe in his work, here is the kicker ( 19 maps). Offical German maps at their finest showing in precise details the German SS Panzers points of contact and retreat. Nipe was bold enough to use these maps and notes as his base. After his work was presented Wolfgang Schneider did his monumental work volumes 1/2 on Tigers in Combat which is a must read for Tiger 1 enthusiasts covering in the 2nd volume the SS panzerkorps struggle with the 3 grenadier divisions and their Tiger 1 Komapnies, giving their true losses and victory claims

There's been plenty of good books written on the subject including....

Paul Carell's 'Scorched Earth-The Russian-German War 1941-44' [1970]
Mark Healy's 'Kursk 1943-The Tide Turns in the East' [1992]
Walter S. Dunn's 'Hitler’s Nemesis-The Red Army, 1930-1945' [1994] and perhaps the most definitive book on the battle by David Glantz & Jonathan House 'The Battle of Kursk' [1999]

As to actual overall losses, who knows?


Was the Sylvester Standler you mention, SS-Standartenführer Sylvester Stadler?

I would have agree with Anzac on this one. There are many great books on the battle you cant discredit one just because its written by someone from another country. You must look at the overall picture. I doubt that George Nipes had any information about the battle that the Russians didnt have. But it sounds like a novel that I would enjoy.

__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

The Soviets did not have German true losses, Nipe had access or maybe the Russian and American authors wanted to ignore .......... Caidins bogus work on the subject "The Tigers are burning" comes to mind.

Great books ....some and yes you can discredit anything if it is all turley one-sde and the authro(s) have not done extensive homework on the subject. We, yes we have taken so much of what we have read as the truth and without question. I have found this since the 1960's especially true of the night air war and the electronics and craft over the Reich until I started interviewing veterans of both sides and looking into captured documentation~ after war reports, that were deemed de-classified. I think the latter is often forgotten and to be of great useage to authors

Stadler one and the same since at the time of Kursk he was in an administrative postion with maps and docs well in his hands

Come on Erich, the soviets had more German generals as prisoners then any other nation in the world. In fact Russia had more German generals then Germany by the end of the war. You mean to tell me that the German generals didnt know their own casualties?? Sorry not buying it.

And out of curiousity what makes you think that all the other authors in the world are wrong and your Nipes isnt??? sounds to me like you might have it backwards. And you having a German backround want to protect your peoples prestiege.

__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler