|
|  |
 |
Members: 12,362
Threads: 26,517
Posts: 326,646
Online: 330
Newest Member:
GeeForce |
|
|
| Russia at War The Largest military conflict in history including Finland, Barbarossa, Stalingrad, Kursk to the Battle for Berlin |

July 20th, 2005, 03:07 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,489
Salute!: 4
Saluted 237 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Prior to the start of WW II Germany built some fairly impressive fortifications on their eastern frontier. Since these were still in existance and, likely mostly intact in late 1944 what effect did these have on the Soviet final push to Berlin? None of the major common texts on this period of the war make any real mention of these fortifications and none state what effect they had on the battle outcome.
It would be interesting to know more about how these fortifications effected the battle.
|

July 22nd, 2005, 06:22 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,613
Salute!: 413
Saluted 212 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Actually don´t remember these being discussed much, at least in the books I´ve read. I think the main weight has been on the fortress cities but if anyone had more info on the use of these earlier fortifications that would be interesting to hear!
__________________
|

July 24th, 2005, 06:25 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,489
Salute!: 4
Saluted 237 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
These fortifications must have had some effect. The main line of them was called the OWB (Oder-Warthe Bend) and was centered on Frankfurt am Oder. The line extended north and south from there to cover the direct approaches to Berlin anchoring on the North on the Warthe River and on the Odra river in the South.
This line included some very large works comparable to those in the Maginot Line. A typical large bunker in this line might be PanzerWerk 717 "Scharnhorst." It was a two story self-contained structure that had three cupolas for machine guns (2 in each), an automatic 50mm mortar and, a pop up flamethrower. The entry also had a machine gun in a flanking position covering it. It also had its own power and water system. The design was supposed to be able to resist 220mm fire or a 500 kg bomb hit. The concrete was 2 meters thick minimum with the cupolas being 250mm cast steel. The specification was based on what Poland had for artillery so, compared to the Maginot line the bunkers were a bit less resistant.
There were at least a dozen such positions as massive or more so in the OWB line alone. Many had connecting tunnels and there were over 30 km of these constructed. I don't know the number of smaller bunkers housing machineguns, 37mm AT guns or, 75mm howitzers but, it must have been similar to the West Wall in numbers and was probably well over 100.
There were lesser systems North and South of this one as well. All included lots of dragon's teeth and mines. River crossings were generally well defended and most, if not all bridges, were designed to be removed or destroyed along with having covering bunkers defending them.
The Scharnhorst bunker shows obvious signs of having been heavily shot up in photos I have seen of it. So, it must have been manned and used in the final days of the war.
|

July 24th, 2005, 08:16 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
What is 'this' book,TA?
Have never read about these forts.
Never knew Germany had anything there.
__________________
|

July 25th, 2005, 01:56 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,613
Salute!: 413
Saluted 212 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
I don´t know if the speed of Russian advance might have helped the Red Army? To me it seems that the east wall never stopped the Red Army as much as the West wall did to the allied troops (?).
Fron the Red Army night operations:
The Soviets also used forward detachments for pursuit operations in the Vistula-Oder campaign (12 January-7 February).
A second example occurred on the night of 29-30 January, when the 44th Brigade, a forward detachment of the 11th Guards Tank Corps, succeeded in breaching the Meseritz fortified area, between Poznan and Kustrin. This operation was significant because it was undertaken on the initiative of the brigade commander, who was functioning as the vanguard of the 1st Tank Army. The army commander described Meseritz as
"...a city of ferro-conerete and steel with underground railways, factories and electric power stations. It could hold a whole army. Armored shafts went underground to a depth of 30-40 meters. On the surface the approaches were blocked with anti-tank obstacles covering many kilometers. Dozens of low domes of the permanent weapons emplacements were studded with gun and machine-gun barrels. The nearby lakes were connected with a system of dams, which in case of need, could flood any sections of the fortified area."
The brigade thus slipped through a supposedly "impenetrable area" without losing a tank and was able to conduct a successful ambush the next morning before linking up with Soviet forces bypassing the once again "impenetrable" Meseritz fortified area.
The Soviets and their Polish allies advanced 310 miles in twenty-three days, an average advance of twelve to fourteen miles a day.
http://www-cgsc.army.mil/carl/resour...SSO.asp#Berlin
__________________
|

July 26th, 2005, 06:33 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,613
Salute!: 413
Saluted 212 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
LAST LAURELS. THE GERMAN DEFENCE OF UPPER SILESIA, JANUARY-MAY 1945
Author: Gunter, G.
http://www.helion.co.uk/product.php?...9&xSec=1601119
claims that Germans did not have the men to occupy the defence system which consisted of several belts of defence systems from Poland to the river Oder. Actually the author goes as far as saying that the Russians " had only the ice of the river Oder to fear..."
Actually Hitler´s logic seems rather weak here : sending men to the western front ( Ardennes ) and Hungary instead of putting them in front of Berlin...The main strike by Red army to the Czech and not Berlin?? No wonder Guderian was quite p****d off.
__________________
|

July 27th, 2005, 02:24 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,489
Salute!: 4
Saluted 237 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by FramerT:
What is 'this' book,TA?
Have never read about these forts.
Never knew Germany had anything there.
|
I have two on fortifications that discuss the construction aspects of these lines but not their combat history:
Fortress Third Reich by Kaufmann and Kaufmann.
and
The Architecture of War by well, I can't find the book right at the moment. The wife "cleaned" the study.......it could be anywhere at this point...... [img]redface.gif[/img]
|

July 27th, 2005, 06:48 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,417
Salute!: 43
Saluted 34 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
The other night they had a show on the History Channel about the final push to Berlin and General Zuekolf (can't spell), but it said that the German general in charge of Berlin flooded a low lying area and that made all the Russian vehicles have to use the roads in the area and the Germans concentrated all their firepower on the roads and took a great toll. It slowed the Russians down but did not help much in the end. They said the German general orginazed his defence in three rings near the river.
Again this is from the History Channel and their "facts" have been leaving alot to be desired lately.
__________________
I need a bailout of only $500,000
|

July 27th, 2005, 09:50 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kai-Petri:
LAST LAURELS. THE GERMAN DEFENCE OF UPPER SILESIA, JANUARY-MAY 1945
Author: Gunter, G.
http://www.helion.co.uk/product.php?...9&xSec=1601119
claims that Germans did not have the men to occupy the defence system which consisted of several belts of defence systems from Poland to the river Oder. Actually the author goes as far as saying that the Russians " had only the ice of the river Oder to fear..."
Actually Hitler´s logic seems rather weak here : sending men to the western front ( Ardennes ) and Hungary instead of putting them in front of Berlin...The main strike by Red army to the Czech and not Berlin?? No wonder Guderian was quite p****d off.
|
I don't believe Hitler had any 'logic' at this stage.
Thinking the allies would sue for peace even if The Bulge was a success...than transfering troops to the East
Thanks for the book titles TA,BTW.
I read how the Russians would sink tanks in rivers and use them as 'invisible' bridges....nothing was going to stop them.
__________________
|

August 17th, 2005, 07:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth Texas, USA
Posts: 811
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I think the motivation and determination of the Russians is why these defenses don't show up much. Like FramerT said, nothing was going to stop them. Their use of manpower to overcome any shortcoming in mechanization could also have been a factor.
I would be interested to know if any of them are still in existance. There was a photo gallery on webshots a while back that was full of a collection of current photos of WWII fortifications in France and Belguim.
__________________
PEOPLE SLEEP PEACEABLY IN THEIR BEDS AT NIGHT ONLY BECAUSE ROUGH MEN STAND READY TO DO VIOLENCE ON THEIR BEHALF. GEORGE ORWELL
|

August 29th, 2005, 06:09 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,506
Salute!: 15
Saluted 26 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Actually Hitler´s logic seems rather weak here : sending men to the western front ( Ardennes ) and Hungary instead of putting them in front of Berlin...The main strike by Red army to the Czech and not Berlin?? No wonder Guderian was quite p****d off.
|
In fact, the decision for the Battle of the Bulge is one of the most idiotic decisions of the whole war! Hitler wanted to assert a fatal blow to one of the three Allies. He respected the British and knew the Red Army was too powerful at that stage, so he chose the 'rookie' Yanks. However, instead of choosing the exhausted Soviets or British, he chose to attack the Allied Army with best healing and recovery systems, which was relatively fresh and in a stable state of growing. So, Germany threw her last blow against the enemy that could resist the blow better and soon overcome it and even gain strenght.
Also, the strategic consideration for the offensive was that a Soviet winter offensive was not likely! This means you're betting on the Red Army (which had launched massive winter offensives in 1941, 1942, 1943 and 1944 and massive summer offensives in 1943 and 1944), some 3 million men strong, within sight of Berlin, would not attack your most vulnerable flank.
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|

August 29th, 2005, 07:34 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth Texas, USA
Posts: 811
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Said it before and will say it again, thank God for Hitler!
__________________
PEOPLE SLEEP PEACEABLY IN THEIR BEDS AT NIGHT ONLY BECAUSE ROUGH MEN STAND READY TO DO VIOLENCE ON THEIR BEHALF. GEORGE ORWELL
|

September 5th, 2005, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,867
Salute!: 70
Saluted 177 Times in 95 Posts
|
|
Found a copy of the Kaufmann/Kaufmann book hevily discounted in London today. If TA hadn't mentioned it here, I might have passed it by. It looks to be a very interesting overview of German bunkers, including the mysterious underground factories - a subject which hasn't been well-covered in the English language.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

October 13th, 2005, 01:47 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 128
Salute!: 15
Saluted 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TA152:
The other night they had a show on the History Channel about the final push to Berlin and General Zuekolf (can't spell), but it said that the German general in charge of Berlin flooded a low lying area and that made all the Russian vehicles have to use the roads in the area and the Germans concentrated all their firepower on the roads and took a great toll. It slowed the Russians down but did not help much in the end. They said the German general orginazed his defence in three rings near the river.
Again this is from the History Channel and their "facts" have been leaving alot to be desired lately.
|
That fact is indeed True and it was Gen Oberst Gotthard Heinrici who organised this by flooding the Oder Bruch and turning the area into a swamp. Given that the Germans mobile capacity was almost zero it didnt hamper them at all unlike the Russians.
|

October 13th, 2005, 02:51 PM
|
 |
Drill Instructor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 6,613
Salute!: 200
Saluted 249 Times in 169 Posts
|
|
Of all the books I have read about the final battles in the East, no real mention of significant fortifications as obstacles for the Russians. If any existed, they were lightly manned by raw recruits and of no real value. The only significant defense was put up at the Seelow Heights. I am even surprised the Battle of Berlin was as intense as it was manned by the leftovers.
__________________
|

October 13th, 2005, 04:31 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 128
Salute!: 15
Saluted 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Other than the festung towns of Breslau, Pillau, and Kustrin there was very little in the way of organised defences. As for the forces involved in the Battles here is the order of battle for the Germans at the time:
OKW RESERVE (later allocated to the LVI Panzer Corps, 9th Army)
18th Panzergrenadier Division (Maj Gen Josef Rauch)
30th & 51st Panzergrenadier Regts
118th Panzer Regt (part)
18th Artillery Regt
ARMY GROUP ‘VISTULA’ (Col Gen Gotthard Heinrici)
III SS ‘Germanic’ Panzer Corps (SS Lt Gen Felix Steiner)
(divisions later allocated to the 9th Army)
11th SS ‘Nordland’ Panzergrenadier Division (SS Maj Gen Jurgen Ziegler / SS Maj Gen Dr Gustav Krukenburg)
23rd ‘Norge’ Panzergrenadier Regt
24th ‘Danmark’ Panzergrenadier Regt
11th SS ‘Hermann von Salza’ Panzer Btn
503rd SS Heavy Tank Btn
11th SS ‘Nordland’ Armoured Reconnaissance Btn
23rd SS ‘Nederland’ Panzergrenadier Division (SS Maj Gen Wagner)
(divisions later allocated to the 3rd Panzer Army)
27th SS ‘Langemarck’ Grenadier Division
28th SS ‘Wallonien’ Grenadier Division
3rd Panzer Army (Gen Hasso von Manteuffel)
‘Swinemunde’ Corps (Lt Gen Ansat)
402nd & 2nd Naval Divisions
XXXII Corps (Lt Gen Schack)
‘Voigt’ & 281st Infantry Divisions
549th Volksgrenadier Division
Stettin Garrison
‘Oder’ Corps (SS Lt Gen von dem Bach / Gen Hörnlein)
610th & ‘Klossek’ Infantry Divisions
XXXXVI Panzer Corps (Gen Martin Gareis)
547th Volksgrenadier Division
1st Naval Division
9th Army (Gen Theodor Busse)
156th Infantry Division
541st Volksgrenadier Division
404th Volks Artillery Corps
406th Volks Artillery Corps
408th Volks Artillery Corps
CI Corps (Gen Wilhelm Berlin / Lt Gen Friedrich Sixt)
5th Light Infantry Division
606th Infantry Division
309th ‘Berlin’ Infantry Division
25th Panzergrenadier Division
111th SPG Training Bde
‘1001 Nights’ Combat Group
LVI Panzer Corps (Gen Helmuth Weidling)
9th Fallschirmjäger Division (Gen Bruno Braüer / Col Harry Herrmann)
25th, 26th & 27th Fallschirmjäger Regts
9th Fallschirmjäger Artillery Regt
20th Panzergrenadier Division (Col / Maj Gen Georg Scholze)
76th & 90th Panzergrenadier Regts
8th Panzer Btn
20th Artillery Regt
‘Müncheberg’ Panzer Division (Maj Gen Werner Mummert)
1st & 2nd ‘Müncheberg’ Panzergrenadier Regts
‘Müncheberg’ Panzer Regt
‘Müncheburg’ Armoured Artillery Regt
920th SPG Training Bde
XI SS Panzer Corps (SS Gen Mathias Kleinheisterkamp)
303rd ‘Döberitz’ Infantry Division
169th Infantry Division
712th Infantry Division
‘Kurmark’ Panzergrenadier Division
502nd SS Heavy Tank Btn
Frankfurt an der Oder Garrison (Col / Maj Gen Ernst Biehler)
V SS Mountain Corps (SS Gen Friedrich Jackeln)
286th Infantry Division
32nd SS ’30. Januar’ Volksgrenadier Division
391st Sy Division
561st SS Tank Hunting Btn
ARMY GROUP CENTRE (Field Marshal Ferdinand Schörner)
4th Panzer Army (Gen Fritz-Herbert Gräser)
(later transferred to the 9th Army)
V Corps (Lt Gen Wagner)
35th SS Police Grenadier Division
36th SS Grenadier Division
275th Infantry Division
342nd Infantry Division
21st Panzer Division
12th Army (Gen Walter Wenck)
XX Corps (Gen Carl-Erik Koehler)
‘Theodor Körner’ RAD Division
‘Ulrich von Hutten’ Infantry Division
‘Ferdinand von Schill’ Infantry Division
‘Scharnhorst’ Infantry Division
XXXIX Panzer Corps (Lt Gen Karl Arndt)
(12 – 21 April 1945 under OKW with the following structure)
‘Clausewitz’ Panzer Division
‘Schlageter’ RAD Division
84th Infantry Division
(21 – 26 April 1945 under 12th Army with the following structure)
‘Clausewitz’ Panzer Division
84th Infantry Division
‘Hamburg’ Reserve Infantry Division
‘Meyer’ Infantry Division
XXXXI Panzer Corps (Lt Gen Holste)
‘von Hake’ Infantry Division
199th Infantry Division
‘V-Weapons’ Infantry Division
1st HJ Tank Destroyer Bde
‘Hermann Göring’ Jagdpanzer Bde
XXXXVIII Panzer Corps (Gen Maximillian Reichsherr von Edelscheim)
14th Flak Division
‘Leipzig’ Battle Group
‘Halle’ Battle Group
Ungrouped Formations
‘Friedrich Ludwig Jahn’ RAD Division (Col Gerhard Klein / Col Franz Weller)
‘Potsdam’ Infantry Division (Col Erich Lorenz)
|

October 22nd, 2005, 12:22 AM
|
|
recruit
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hampshire UK
Posts: 1
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hi just to mention i visted the Meseritz fortified line (now in Poland) last week snd had aguided tour of a section of PzWerke 717 Scharnhorst group. it is an amazing place. i have a pictures if anyone is interested. the damage seen wass actually caused by the russians after they captured it, to see how strong it was, the plan to complete the section visted (near the village of Kalawa) with heavy artillery was never completed but inside the finished bunker you can see the blanked off walls of tunnels never completed. The polish guide stated it was manned by an ear battalion.
As for the battle when the 1st guards tank army broke through the line on the 29/01/45 some German units managed to get underground before the Main soviet army followed up and the battle lasted 2 days.
Please email for more info or photos, and if you get the chance it is well worth a visit
Matt
|

October 22nd, 2005, 04:20 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 437
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
While reading all of these posts one thing stuck in the back of my mind. That was the German invasion of France and the lowlands in 1940. Did the Germans possibly get a taste of their own medicine, with the Russians simply using their heads and lessons from early in the war and bypassing all or most of these fortifications?? Remember the effectiveness of the Maginot Line.
Later
|

October 25th, 2005, 12:53 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,613
Salute!: 413
Saluted 212 Times in 161 Posts
|
|
Definitely the Red Army had started to use some of the Blitzkrieg methods in their offensive system but I think "maskirovka" that is masking the main attack from the enemy truly worked here. Hitler did not believe the attack would come to Berlin in 1945 (?!) and in the summer 1944 the Red Army attacked "in the wrong place" as well.
The fortifications did keep big numbers of Red Army men tied to them but Stalin had troops to use while Hitler did not.
__________________
|

November 11th, 2005, 03:20 AM
|
|
recruit
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dover, DE, United States
Posts: 4
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I don't really know much about this subject, but, here goes. Common sense would leave us to believe that, if anything, the Germans would learn from their own experiences and therefore not build a fortified line that would just defend a segment of the Eastern front, as the French did with the Maginot line. So, therefore, wouldn't the Germans build a concentrated string of fortresses to the East of Berlin?
Interesting subject- would like to find out more.
__________________
"The death of one man is a tragedy; The death of millions is a statistic" -Joseph Stalin
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |