|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,498
Threads: 18,466
Posts: 231,046
Online: 245
Newest Member:
ogi4ulove |
|
|
| Russia at War The Largest military conflict in history including Finland, Barbarossa, Stalingrad, Kursk to the Battle for Berlin |

January 21st, 2006, 10:18 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,368
Salute!: 49
Saluted 31 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Could the battle of Stalingrad had a different out come, if as was planned the 11th Army or so attacked?
What was behind the thinking to break sections of the 11th army and send them else where, and then to redirect the remaining 11th Army to the Northern Front.
It seem to me another case of muddled thinking lets take Leningrad, no change of mind now Stalingrad, from what I can make out moving the 11th Army was a error.
Can anyone give more information on these events?
__________________
 Man of the Year 1942
Regards, Richard
|

January 23rd, 2006, 05:13 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,870
Salute!: 102
Saluted 35 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Hitler had decided that he´ll take both Leningrad and Stalingrad at the same time. However when his troops were at the long end of the supply line and troops exhausted the Red Army attacked and beat the 6th Army. The troops at Leningrad were just about to start attacking when Russians started their own attack and the Germans ended up defending their positions.
The 11th Army and its parts could not have saved Stalingrad as the destiny was -in my opinion- decided when the Germans divided their troops to Caucasus and Stalingrad. The troops were not enough powerful to fight the enemy.
All in all the Germans were lucky and also showed how good fighters they are as the Red Army aimed to destroy all the Army Groups with their attacks and actually "only" Stalingrad was surrounded. Stalin and Zhukov had much bigger plans than just taking Stalingrad!
__________________
|

January 23rd, 2006, 05:37 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,368
Salute!: 49
Saluted 31 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
What could have happen if Army Group A swung towards Stalingrad?
Opp’s I just remembered something was Hitler in charge about that time setting up that stupid situation where he reports to himself?
__________________
 Man of the Year 1942
Regards, Richard
|

January 23rd, 2006, 08:53 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,949
Salute!: 98
Saluted 80 Times in 60 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Richard42:
What was behind the thinking to break sections of the 11th army and send them else where, and then to redirect the remaining 11th Army to the Northern Front.
|
Perhaps you should read Manstein's memories, Lost Battles. He was the commander of 11tf Army at the time. I'm away from my library, but I recall the headquarters of 11th A. did go North but its fighting component was effectively dissolved and spread around to make up for losses.
Careful with reading LB, as vM tends to put himself in a better light, and his attitude is somewhat like "As I told Hitler"
Good read, nevertheless.
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

January 23rd, 2006, 09:05 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,368
Salute!: 49
Saluted 31 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Thanks Za Rodinu, I just dusted off the book from collection title Lost Victories I will have to read it again it's been many years since I looked at it. [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
 Man of the Year 1942
Regards, Richard
|

January 24th, 2006, 12:00 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,393
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I don't think there could have been any change in what actually happened. Von Manstein's XI Army was certainly a good formation, but Paulus' VI and Hoth's IV Panzer were very large formations, as well as the most experienced and best in the entire Eastern Front. Nevertheless, they were wasted in brutal and usless urban warfare for a heap of ruins called Stalingrad in the worst possible way by Hitler AND many mediocre, megalomaniac generals.
Paulus VI Army could have made a difference in Italy, in Normandy, in the Battle of the Bulge, in the Battle of Berlin, but it got destroyed in the filthy streets of Stalingrad because of the Red Army's blood and the idiocy of the German High Command.
The XI Army would have faced the same fate.
As for Army Group 'A', it could have certainly provided a severe blow to the entire Soviet southern sector, if and only if, attacked jointly with Army Group 'B'. Then they could have taken Stalingrad and the Volga and (I doubt it, due to supply situations) headed up to Astrakhan and the Caspain Sea, cutting off the Caucasus (again, I doubt it, since Soviet formations between the Don and the Turkish border could have very well hid in the mountains and been supplied by the Soviet Fleet, from the Black and Caspian sea).
Then what? Moscow's southern flank is exposed, yes, but I doubt the Germans have enough strenght to push against Tula and Moscow from the south. Even more, the Germans are in possession now of a huge exposed northern flank, from Kursk and Voroniezh all the way to Astrakhan, with the Volga and immense steppes in the middle. Given the German strenght in 1942, such position was unbearable in any case.
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|

January 24th, 2006, 12:08 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,368
Salute!: 49
Saluted 31 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Thanks everyone I do agree Stalingrad was a very bad call a waste of resources. [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]
__________________
 Man of the Year 1942
Regards, Richard
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |