|
|  |
 |
Members: 3,719
Threads: 14,490
Posts: 180,707
Online: 253
Newest Member:
pony9a |
|
|
| Russia at War The Largest military conflict in history including Finland, Barbarossa, Stalingrad, Kursk to the Battle for Berlin |

August 10th, 2007, 12:55 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,385
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
__________________
There is an ass in my avatar.
|

August 10th, 2007, 01:43 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 3,842
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
Hitler was obsessed with oil. He was obsessesed in protecting the oilfield in Rumania and was obsessed in obtaining the oil fields in the Caucasus. But as previously mentioned, he did not even think about denying the Russians access to the oil by having them bombed. I believe he did this because he honestly thought he would be able to obtain and hold those oilfields so he did not want to destroy them. Same line of thinking as to why the Generals could not get permission to blow bridges because Hitler wanted them intact to use in his counterattacks. Generals' response, 'Gegenangriff, mit vas!'
It also seems like the Generals were more interesting in destroying armies than destroying economic capabilities. I would have expected more of the General Staff.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

August 15th, 2007, 05:25 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,518
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
Was'nt "Spring Awakening",the failed attempt at retaking Budapest, really for the oilfields?
|

August 15th, 2007, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,385
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
Yes, in part. A desperate measure because the Hungarian output, or what was left of it, was largely symbolic but when you don't have anything else...
__________________
There is an ass in my avatar.
|

October 14th, 2007, 10:03 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hull, England
Posts: 108
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
Quote:
Originally Posted by PzJgr
Hitler was obsessed with oil. He was obsessesed in protecting the oilfield in Rumania and was obsessed in obtaining the oil fields in the Caucasus. But as previously mentioned, he did not even think about denying the Russians access to the oil by having them bombed. I believe he did this because he honestly thought he would be able to obtain and hold those oilfields so he did not want to destroy them. Same line of thinking as to why the Generals could not get permission to blow bridges because Hitler wanted them intact to use in his counterattacks. Generals' response, 'Gegenangriff, mit vas!'
It also seems like the Generals were more interesting in destroying armies than destroying economic capabilities. I would have expected more of the General Staff.
|
Nice to see some logic about why Hitler didn't bomb Soviet oilfields when he could. I suspect reason was behind fighting at Stalingrad as well - that since this was where the Red Army stood its ground this was the place to fight it. I'd be interested to see what effect Operation Blue had on German fuel stocks and transport capacity and whether Germany's southern armies could do much different by the time that the German army closed up to the Volga.
PS 'Stopped at Stalingrad' was really rather good.
|

April 23rd, 2008, 08:44 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,385
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
Do you mind if I  this thread up a bit? To me it's central to East Front strategy.
__________________
There is an ass in my avatar.
|

April 24th, 2008, 02:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seattle Wa
Posts: 234
|
|
Re: Interesting article on Soviet oil
This is a very interesting thread. Where do you think the natives were to come in on this? We all know the troubles Russia has had in the region these last few centuries, basically every since they has decided to go there to begin with.
I can on one hand see Hitlers logic in going after Stalingrad, would you want the Russians to have that on your flank? Keep in mind, the Don retreat left a lot of the Russian army intact, on the other side of the Volga and in Stalingrad. I can also see the gamble he took going south. I'm willing to bet he was hoping for help from the natives in a big way.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |