|
|  |
 |
Members: 5,680
Threads: 17,395
Posts: 216,757
Online: 291
Newest Member:
rwelch1874 |
|
|
| Russia at War The Largest military conflict in history including Finland, Barbarossa, Stalingrad, Kursk to the Battle for Berlin |

October 26th, 2006, 07:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Stanford Tuck had a Spam, onion, & potato soup served to him by a Russian soldier when he escaped late in the war.
|

October 27th, 2006, 05:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote
_________________________________________________
If they were looked after first, 10% doesn't seem much, does it
_________________________________________________
I think I see what you mean Za.
That figure of 10% applies "only" to lend lease food going to the Soviet military, Russia could comfortably feed the Red army from their own resources for as long as the war lasted.
In other words lend lease food, although the numbers look very impressive, [and were impressive] was in no way vital for the Red army.
|

October 27th, 2006, 03:42 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
About aluminium, it's true that USSR found a way to make planes using the smaller quantity of aluminium possible, the program which gave birth to the Lagg-3 was clearly oriented toward this objective, but it was nevertheless an issue for the Soviet warplane industry, I believe.
For example, the Pe-2 medium bomber/attack plane/dive bomber production suffered some delays and had to be reconsidered, the Tu-2 could not be mass built until Soviets were supplied with enough aluminium from their allies, and as soon as sufficient amount of aluminium flowed in, it replaced "plywood" whenever possible in plane construction (I believe the last Yak generations were all metal for example, but I'll check this).
The impregnated wood used by Soviet was a very good material though, but as Za said, it was a second choice.
I'll post some sources later on, but I really think the aluminium supplies were more important than the food supplies for the Red Army
Edit : here's the text
"Vladimir Gorbunocv was chief of one of the departments of the People's Commissariat of the Aircraft Industry (...). Hi concept, forwarded in 1939, was an aircraft having an all-wood structure, realising the necessity of greatly increasing the output of combat fighters asap, and the limitations that might be imposed on this process by lack of aluminiuů. 'Even if only one small grove of trees is left in Russia' thought Gorbunov,'even then we shall be able to build fighters'."
From Gordon and Khazanov Soviet Combat Aircraft of the 2nd World War
[ 27. October 2006, 02:23 PM: Message edited by: chocapic ]
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

November 2nd, 2006, 06:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Nuther interesting angle on this.
http://www.wargamer.com/articles/lldocefx.asp
The Allies supplied 317,000 tons of explosive materials including 22 million shells that was equal to just over half of the total Soviet production of approximately 600,000 tons. Additionally the Allies supplied 103,000 tons of toluene, the primary ingredient of trinitrotoluene (more commonly known as TNT) while Soviet manufacture totaled 116,000 tons. If the Allies had not shipped these amounts of explosive materials, the Soviets undoubtedly would have had even more serious ammunition problems in addition to all their other shortcomings. The Soviet's ammunition shortages, mainly early in the war, caused them to be conservative with artillery shells and reinforced the use of their field guns in direct fire mode. This was done even though it brought greater risk to the artillery crews and their guns.
The Allies shipped, in addition to explosives and ammunition, 991 million miscellaneous shell cartridges to speed up the manufacturing of ammunition.
|

November 7th, 2006, 01:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
On explosive materials....
This was largely a question of optimal division of labor between Allies. In 1941-42 US industry was not quite ready for war-time production yet - there was little engineering experience in producing tanks and combat aircraft. However, US chemical industry was [with the Germans]the best in the world and production of explosives does not require all that much special expertise. So production of explosives was much easier for US to handle at the time then production of armored vehicles etc. E. Stettinius, writes about it to the tune of "We could not do everything Soviets wanted, but we tried to do what we could".
|

December 7th, 2006, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chromeboomerang:
A Proffessors view.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1385548/posts
“In the first 1.5 years the Soviet Union was fighting for survival and would have won without lend lease, but further victories and movement to Europe would be questionable,” he reported.
There were 20 million homeless, and 25 million dead, four tenth of agriculture was lost and half of the industrial production was destroyed. “If there were no lend lease the losses could have been much heavier, the war would have lasted longer and the victory was not so complete”, Tuyll concluded.
|
mmmm....don't mess with the freepers 
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 7th, 2006, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Probably true though.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 11th, 2006, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I agree to some extend, but I think lend lease program had its stronger impact on the course of operations from the very end of 41 to mid 42, not after 1.5 years of war.
Maybe this guy is talking about lend leased trucks in the great 43 and 44 summer/spring offensives.
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 11th, 2006, 02:52 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Chocapic, the problem is that lend lease didn't kick in really until post Stalingrad, if you look at the figures they bear this out. As I posted elsewhere, the RKKA truck park in 1941 stood at 272k, by the end of the year with vehicles taken out of the civilian sector, new production and despite losses this had risen to 318k with 0.4% being imported models. Even on January first 1943 the number of lend lease trucks stood at 6.1% of the total, how could they have had as massive an impact early on as people suggest if this is the case?
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 11th, 2006, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Yes, that's why I said lend leased trucks had an impact later on, like in 43 and 44.
(BTW I thought that, during the whole war, USSR was delivered more or less as many trucks as it produced on its own.)
But if you consider planes, for example, even if only a few have been delivered in early 42, they were direly needed and in some places of the front (Leningrad area, Murmansk area), they represented a very significant part of the planes available at these time and places, and these lend leased planes were as good if not better than the then widely used polikarpov or migs.
This wasn't true anymore in 1943.
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 11th, 2006, 03:34 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,489
Salute!: 1
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Actually if im not mistaken I am pretty sure that there were a few very brave French pilots that flew along with the Russians in the Siege of Leningrad to help reduce the Luftwaffe threat.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

December 11th, 2006, 04:29 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Nope, by the end of the war 77% of trucks in Soviet service were domestic production, 4% captured and 19% imported.
Aircraft etc I can't find statistics for.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 11th, 2006, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
@Sloniksp : I think you are refering to the Normandie Niemen squad, I'm not sure they were flying for the VVS as early (I don't know much about their operational history - shame on me)
@ Stefan : according to my source USSR was delivered 470.000 non armored vehicule which represented more than USSR production, but I'm inclined to believe you are knowledgeable on the subject and my source is wrong and you are right.
Have you got the sum numbers for the entire war ?
About plane, my source says 14.000 and 12.000 for tanks, which is supposed to represent about 10% of soviet production, but now you make me doubt of my source (old 1970 strategy and tactics - I was a wargamer in my youth [img]smile.gif[/img] )
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 11th, 2006, 06:05 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,489
Salute!: 1
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Chocapic,
I believe they might be the ones I will however try to find more.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

December 11th, 2006, 06:07 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Take a look over here:
http://www.1jma.dk/articles/1jmaarticlelendlease.htm
Even provides breakdown by type of truck.
According to another source the soviets got 20,000 AFV's (excluding those lost at sea) and that includes personnel carriers and so on. Data from:
http://www.axishistory.com/index.php?id=5275
Wikipedia agrees with you're source on aircraft, I'll check with Overy and a few other sources when I get home. I'd always be dubious of any book written during the 70's concerning the USSR as the Soviets were very careful what they actually told the west about their wartime production, tactics etc. Most of it comes from German intelligence documents captured by the US at the end of the war, making them dubious at best.
EDIT: Now isn't this interesting, Free French pilots did serve in the USSR:
http://www.1jma.dk/articles/1jmafrenchrussia.htm
[ 11. December 2006, 02:16 PM: Message edited by: Stefan ]
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 11th, 2006, 09:48 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Thanks alot for links.
In the first link I don't understand why the first chart mentions no imported trucks until 1943 when the 3rd chart shows 17.400 dodge, ford etc trucks and 9.200 towing vehicules delivered in 1942
Anyway my source giving an overall domestic prodction below 500.000 looks way off.
In the 2nd link, the last chart gives a sum not to far(more like 13-14.000 I guess) from the 12.000 I mentioned.
About the Normandie Niemen, looks like they did not fought before 1943 http://www.acesofww2.com/Normandy-Ni...die-Niemen.htm
BTW one of their Yak3 is still on display near Paris and in a pretty good shape, I saw it few years ago, she's a beauty [img]graemlins/rachel.gif[/img]
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 12th, 2006, 12:09 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
That seems to fit in with what my link says, created December 4th 1942. This probably deserves a thread of it's own.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 12th, 2006, 02:23 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 679
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
yeah, or we could merge the 2 subject by saying these French pilots, when given the choice of their weapons, favored the Yak over lend leased Spitfires or Airacobras.
__________________
Children of rape and incest must live, their fathers must fry on the electric chair.
21st century FTW !
|

December 12th, 2006, 03:34 PM
|
 |
Cavalry Rupert 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,892
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Indeed, good point. One of these days I'll put together a uniform for one of these chaps.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
|

December 12th, 2006, 03:59 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,489
Salute!: 1
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Good link Chocapic you beat me to it 
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

December 12th, 2006, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: thats a good question!
Posts: 634
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
the yak was a very sturdy and stable platform, i would choose it as a "workhorse", but i still am attached to the spitfires
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." -Winston Churchill
|

December 13th, 2006, 09:00 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,018
Salute!: 11
Saluted 14 Times in 9 Posts
| | |