Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Battle of Britian

Discussion in 'Air War in Western Europe 1939 - 1945' started by B-17engineer, Feb 16, 2008.

  1. B-17engineer

    B-17engineer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    6
    IN your opion what do you think Brtian did that Germany didn't to win the Battle of Britian



    Thanks,
    B-17engineer
     
  2. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    In my opinion I think the only reason the British won the Battle of Britain was because Goeing was an idiot, and should have continued bombing the factories and british airfields, becasue the british couldn't keep up with the pressure. However once the strategy changed to terror bombing (Blitz) the RAF had time to recouperate and repair airfields and factories, so the germans shot them down then they were rebuilt it became a continious circle. Ultimately the germans failed to get air superority over england and operation sealion was postponed and later cancelled.

    But hey thats just my opinion.
     
  3. geord

    geord Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    1
    In my humble opinion it was, as always the case, a complex combination of things that occured in which the British did things mostly right and the Germans mostly wrong.
    Fighter Command was able to hold on just long enough to buy TIME. The time it took for Bomber Command to render many of the German invasion barges useless. These barges were hard to come by and their losses were a major blow. RAF Bomber Command airmen felt that they have been continually overlooked in all the history books about their contribution to the Battle of Britan. I suppose most will say that the turning point in the battle was the Sept 7th raid on London. The Germans, misled by their intellience regarding Figher Command strength, switched to bombing London after the Luftwaffer bungle on the night of 24-25 August. Sperrle wanted to continue concentrating on airfields but Kesslering argued that the RAF would pull back north and only the defence of London - a target they had to defend - would draw them out to fight. However this led to the restoration of Figher Command the Battle of Britain was won.
    At this point it was now more than ever a battle of attrition and Hitler inexplicably cut aircraft production in Sept of 1940 when their losses were more than new aircraft built.
    So, it was more than just THE FEW who won the Battle of Britain.
     
    Za Rodinu likes this.
  4. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    Personally I think it was the radar that made it possible to win the BoB. Thus the fighter planes were almost always directed to the attackers with precision and accurate timing.
     
  5. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    geord is quite right - there are many factors involved. As we've said here many times, another thing the Germans did wrong was to rely on faulty intelligence ; this led to the wrong airfields being targeted, for instance.
     
  6. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    IIRC, Hermann's IQ was 140, not quite an idiot.

    Those "invasion" barges were taken from the normal civilian river and inland channel transportation system, on which so much of the German, Dutch and Belgian economy depended (Rhine, Maas, etc, complexes). Just the fact that these (totally unsuitable for invasion work, by the way) barges were immobilised as becoming a more and more serious problem for the economy as so much depended on them. Having them doing noyhing in the French ports was becoming more and more unbearable as the economy was grinding to a stop, no to mention the numbers that were being sunk courtesy of the BC.

    Yes, it was more than The Few, actually The Many, God bless them.

    Actually, how effective was the airfield bombing? How many fighters were destroyed on the ground, how many pilots got killed, how many ground specialist (erks etc) were killed, how much plant was rendered useless and for how long? Was this airfield bombing effective at all?
     
  7. TA152

    TA152 Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    120
    I agree with KP and the great help radar was to the British. Finding aircraft in the air is not easy, even on a clear day.
     
  8. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    Dosnt Make him a good combat leader Za.:)
     
  9. B-17engineer

    B-17engineer Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    6
    Yea, I was thinking radar and keeping the pressure on Britain with bombing and taking out there industries
     
  10. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Yes, Tomcat, as I say elsewhere he would be better off taking care of his toy train layouts and art "collection" than playing at wars.
     
  11. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
  12. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    The figure for serviceable RAF fighters destroyed on the ground for the whole of the Battle Of Britain is approximately 20 ;)
     
  13. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Wow! Foolproof recipe for success!
     
  14. geord

    geord Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    1
    When the Germans concentrated on the airfields, it was more than just the number of aircraft destroyed on the ground. It was also all the repair and support facilities, ammunition and fuel stockpiles and condition of the airfield. Continual bombing forced the fighter squadrons to take off and defend their airfields every time the Germans came plus regular patrols and interceptions from sector control. Pilots became exhausted and their attrition caused more concern than just the aircraft.
     
  15. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    Quite right - if the Luftwaffe's Intel had been accurate, the reults could have been devastating. As it was, valuable effort was expended on such non-front-line stations as Ford, Detling, Eastchurch, etc - and navigational errors caused Croydon ( a Satellite airfield ) to be attacked instead of Kenley ( a Sector airfield ) etc......
     
  16. mac_bolan00

    mac_bolan00 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    20
    bomb the fighter bases, using a combination of high bombers (do-17 and he-111s) while the ju-87 and 88s would do low-level weasel attacks. force the fighters to fight over their own airfields.
     
  17. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    I thought that that was what the Luftwaffe were trying to do, anyway ? :confused:
     
  18. mac_bolan00

    mac_bolan00 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    20
    on the second phase and they were actually winning. but churchill ordered the bombing of berlin and that caused ther shift to bombing london, aloowing the fighters to recover.
     
  19. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    Despite 'actually winning', the Ju87 was withdrawn from the Battle after August 18th having suffered unsustainable losses. The tactic of attacking airfields had already failed ; the only Sector Station ever to be put out of action was Biggin Hill, and then only for a few hours on September 1st.

    The 'Hitler spite' regarding the attack on London theory is an old chestnut. Kesselring had, from the outset of the Battle, pressed for an all-out attack on London to draw the RAF fighters into battle. Sperrle disagreed and argued that the RAF should be destroyed on the ground. As we have discussed here many times before, actual ground losses for the RAF were minimal and Kesselring's view that the RAF should be forced into the air by massed attacks on a single target in daylight finally prevailed in September. Hitler made his famous speech for Political reasons but the daylight attack was made for military reasons.

    The salient point which everyone seems to overlook is that the Battle of Britain was fought by Germany with the objective of a swift, overwhelming Political victory ( ie a collapse of National will, as had happened in the Blitzkrieg on the Low Countries ).

    And, tough though it may be to some to have to admit it, they lost.

    And, if they'd continued attacking airfields and relying on their 'Intelligence', they'd still have lost.
     
  20. mac_bolan00

    mac_bolan00 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    20
    Really? At the rate the RAF was losing fighters and fighter pilots?
     

Share This Page