Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Battle of Narvik

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by Tomba, Jun 10, 2005.

  1. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    People in a hurry can do things you wouldn't believe, trust me. But whatever.
     
  2. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    Never underestimate the human ability to screw up. Admitedly if true that was a major one.
     
  3. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    We have no evidence that such a thing happened. People cannot make a 6in shell fit the equipment designed to take 8in shells, regardless of their hurry.
     
  4. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    I think we need a clarification...

    Were the wrong size shells delivered to the ship by mistake, and they had no choice but to sail with them due to the time deadline, or were the wrong shells stowed aboard by accident when the correct ones were available?
     
  5. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Neither. According to the ship's War Diary, written by the First Officer, the main battery didn't open fire in the fjord because it could not identify a target. The smaller weapons did open fire and struck some houses, the shoreline, etc. The ship certainly had 8in shells on board as she performed a rudimentary practice shoot two days before her loss.
     
  6. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    What made attacking shore batteries so much fun before precision weapons was the fact that damn near only way you could knock them out was if you hit the guns themselves, whereas with a ship the guns can be silenced by hits to multiple locations.

    Can anyone think out any other warships lost to shore guns?
     
  7. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Wake Island saw some very effective gunnery by the shore batteries. I forget the names of the victims.
    There were probably a couple ships that ran aground and were subsequently dismantled by artillery.
    I don't know anything about the Dardanelles, but I assume some ships were hit by shore batteries.
    Can we include Port Arthur? That's a rather different issue.
     
  8. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Several Federal warships were sunk by Confederate shore artillery during the American Civil War. And an American destroyer was wrecked by Japanese shore batteries at Iwo Jima, IIRC.
     

Share This Page