Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Belgian T-13

Discussion in 'Western Europe' started by yan taylor, Sep 12, 2014.

  1. yan taylor

    yan taylor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    36
    Hello everyone, I have been researching the Belgian T-13 Self-Propelled Gun and I cannot seem to locate the elevation of the main 47mm Canon, now I am sure that this gun would be derived from the 47mm FRC anti-tank gun, and the elevation of the FRC is -3° to +20°, so would this apply to the one mounted on the T-13?, and if so would this also apply to the three variants? (B1, B2 & B3).

    Thank you for any help.
    Yan.
     
  2. hubbar1949

    hubbar1949 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2015
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    the 47 Mm cannon (Nicknamed the "Quatre-Sept" in the Belgian troops) was an anti-tank weapon.
    Did you notice that in the T13, when the Army wanted to acquire this kind of armor, the politician agreed the buy only if able to fire to the back only? (the politician made an assumption that we just needed a defensive army ... so, if it had been able to shoot on the fore side, it would have been deemed "an offensive weapon"!).

    The fact is that when modified with the turret and the cannon, the weight was far to high, and that was felt during the 18 day campaign: our troops had to abandon many of them due to transmission failure...

    hubbar49
     
  3. Fred Wilson

    Fred Wilson "The" Rogue of Rogues

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    328
    Location:
    Vernon BC Canada
    belasar likes this.
  4. belasar

    belasar Court Jester

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,515
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Great links!
     
  5. Ruud

    Ruud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2012
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    222
    Location:
    Maastricht Netherlands
    OMFG ...and they define an attack as a negative retreat ?
     
  6. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
  7. Dave55

    Dave55 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    194
    Location:
    Atlanta
  8. phylo_roadking

    phylo_roadking Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    155
    It was all about how other nations viewed your political stance; a nation with a numerically large army, and VERY recently declaring itself Neutral...had to appear to be Neutral ;) Belgium actually had the "largest" land army in Europe in terms of the number of reservists in the army vs. the total population...especially after the disaster of WWI that Belgium experienced...and its sudden volte-face as a result of the (defence) budget crisis in 1935/36 from being a full partner in the Locarno pact to being a declared Neutral meant that everyone around them were closely watching their degree of Neutrality.
     

Share This Page