Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Convoy destroyed on way to Iwo Jima?

Discussion in 'Naval Warfare in the Pacific' started by karenlalaniz, Apr 4, 2012.

  1. karenlalaniz

    karenlalaniz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    18
    Hi. I'm still helping my father with new memories that crop up. I'm trying to find information on this one. My father copied Japanese code which was then given to a cryptanalyst. Without going into to much detail, the jist of it is that a message that his team deciphered, off of Iwo Jima (a few weeks before the initial invasion in 1945) and sent on resulted in a Japanese convoy headed to Iwo Jima being sunk/destroyed. Thousands died. And now, all these years later, he is riddled with guilt. I am helpless to help him in dealing with survivors guilt, but I can try to find information on the episode he remembers. He wants to see it in writing.

    And once again, I turn to you, my WWII Forums friends. Has anybody every heard of this? Could you give me advice on where to look? So much of what he did was top secret, so it's not in his military records. But it means a lot when I can point to something that says this is what he remembers.

    Thanks in advance!

    Karen
     
  2. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,047
    Likes Received:
    2,366
    Location:
    Alabama
    I'm not aware of a US convoy being lost. The Japanese, on the other hand, lost a great number of ships, men and equipment trying prepare the defenses of Iwo Jima
     
  3. belasar

    belasar Court Jester

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,515
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Actually many Japanese convoys were heavily devastated by American attacks. In essence he did nothing different than a search plane that locates an enemy force, reports it and it is then attacked. He has nothing to be ashamed about as both sides did much the same. Unfortnately because of War time security his actions could not be acknowledged publicly and perhaps he feels as he does because of this.
     
  4. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    At this time of the war 'packs' of two or three US submarines often wiped out smaller Japanese convoys(5 to 10 vessels) to the last ship.

    I could not find any info in 'Silent Victory' about convoys to Iwo being attacked but I remember convoys to Saipan and Guam lost all ships more than once.
     
  5. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,130
    Likes Received:
    2,497
    Karen,
    The following is from "HyperWar" and is just a very small account. There may be further reference contain in this or other sections on other Japanese convoys that were attacked.

    "
    When the Americans invaded Saipan in June, Imperial General Headquarters placed the defense of the Volcano group directly under Tokyo, organized the 109th Infantry Division, and sent it to Iwo under the command of Lieutenant General Tadamichi Kuribayashi. Tokyo strategists correctly estimated that Iwo Jima would be the choice for an Allied landing and they set about to make it impregnable. Thanks to the energy and skill of General Kuribayashi, they almost did.
    Troops originally intended to reinforce the Marianas were now diverted to Iwo Jima. Because the island had no harbor, and attack by United States submarines was feared, reinforcements were unloaded at Chichi Jima, whence they were sent on to Iwo by small craft. This procedure did not save them from loss. On 18 July 1944, for example, U.S. submarine Cobia sank Nisshu Maru, transporting a tank regiment from Japan to Iwo, about 180 miles northwest of Chichi.Most of the troops were rescued but 28 tanks were lost. In six months, the Japanese lost about 1500 men en route to Iwo by surface and submarine attacks on their vessels.

    Occasional sinkings of transports did little to check the build-up. Now relieved of arming Marianas and Marshalls, Japan had plenty of steel, concrete and other material to spare. Keen-eyed aerial photo interpreters working for Admiral Turner watched prepared positions on Iwo grow in strength and intensity from day to day. Owing to cliffs on the bulgy northeastern part of the pear-shaped island, the only places possible to land on were the beaches north and..... "


    HyperWar: History of US Naval Ops in WWII--XIV: Victory in the Pacific [Chapter 1-1]

    You may find more, check on ChiChi Jima & HaHa Jima also, for convoy reinforcement routes.

    Thanks to the work of your Dad and those he worked with the lives of many Marines and GI's were save.
     
    karenlalaniz likes this.
  6. karenlalaniz

    karenlalaniz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    18
    I hope that was clear. I meant that a Japanese convoy of several ships with thousands of Japanese was sunk/destroyed due to United States military intelligence. My father was aboard a submarine as part of a five person team that was breaking the Japanese code based in Katakana. He remembers many of the messages but this one in particular was discussed and my father hit the switch that sent it on to their superiors. That's why he feels responsible. I think that it is coming with age - wanting to reconcile with oneself. I can't truly make sense of it because as much as I want to understand, I don't believe anyone who wasn't in that type of situation can.

    He said that he read recently in the newspaper about this particular incident. And in it someone was quoted as saying that this action likely won the battle of Iwo Jima because so many troops and equipment never arrived. Of course, my father's take is that he took the lives of thousands of Japanese - without ever firing a shot.

    Anyway, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder really stinks! Especially when the sufferer is 91-years old. When we published our book, Breaking the Code, I thought the major part of his story was told. Turns out I was wrong.

    Thank you for helping! ~Karen
     
  7. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Do you know the name of the sub he was on? I can't locate it quickly in the book. It would help narrow the search. I'm looking around, and so far, have not located it specifically. As mentioned previously, many Japanese convoys were sunk, so without specifics, it will be hard to find.
     
  8. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,047
    Likes Received:
    2,366
    Location:
    Alabama
    I remembered that a large armor formation was lost enroute to Iwo

    Here is a article about it:

    USS Cobia (SS 245) was launched on November 28, 1943. In June 1944, she began the first of six war patrols in which she sank thirteen Japanese vessels for a total of 20,000 tons of enemy shipping. By July 1944, Cobia had established herself in the annals of World War II sub history by attacking an enemy convoy bound for Japanese-held Iwo Jima.
    Cobia sank two vessels, including a troop transport carrying a Japanese tank battalion of twenty-eight tanks. U.S. Marines considered this sinking critical to their success in capturing Iwo six months later. Cobia's most colorful battle took place in February 1945, when she engaged two armed Japanese sea trucks in a running gun duel. Cobia sank both of them, but not without the loss of Ralph Clark Huston Jr, a 20 mm gun loader and Cobia's only casualty of the war. Cobia was nearly lost in May 1945, during an eight-hour depth charging by the Japanese minesweeper Hatsutaka. The minesweeper attacked Cobia in 120 feet of water and blasted her over twenty feet into the muddy seafloor of the Gulf of Siam. Cobia escaped intact, but heavily damaged. Ironically, Cobia's fate became intertwined with two Manitowoc-built boats through this incident. Hatsutaka sank the Manitowoc-built submarine Lagarto the week before attacking Cobia and the enemy minesweeper was sunk less than a week after Cobia's attack by USS Hawkbill, another Manitowoc-built submarine
    .
    USS COBIA | Wisconsin Maritime Website

    I do hope that your father can accept the deaths for what the were; the price of war that has to be paid.
     
    karenlalaniz likes this.
  9. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,130
    Likes Received:
    2,497
    If there is a possibility of your Father having a wrong date this sounds awfully similar to what he is relating to you.

    Take Ichi convoy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The Take Ichi (竹一[SUP]?[/SUP]) ("Bamboo No. 1") convoy was a Japanese convoy of World War II. The convoy left Shanghai on 17 April 1944, carrying two infantry divisions to reinforce Japan's defensive positions in the Philippines and western New Guinea. United States Navy (USN) submarines attacked the convoy on 26 April and 6 May, sinking four transports and killing more than 4,000 soldiers. These losses caused the convoy to be diverted to Halmahera, where the surviving soldiers and their equipment were unloaded.
    The Take Ichi convoy's losses had important strategic results. The failure to bring the two divisions to their destination without loss contributed to the Japanese Imperial General Headquarters' decision to move Japan's defensive perimeter back by 600 mi (970 km). The divisions' combat power was also blunted by their losses, and while they both saw action against United States Army forces, they contributed little to Japan's attempt to defend its empire.

    [TABLE="class: toc"]
    [TR]
    [TD]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    In September 1943, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) and Imperial Japanese Army (IJA) agreed to establish defensive positions along what was termed Japan's "absolute zone of national defense". The zone's perimeter reached from the Marianas Islands and Caroline Islands to western New Guinea and the Banda and Flores Seas.[SUP][3][/SUP] At this time there were few Army units in the area, and it was decided to move combat units from China and Manchuria to protect the air bases which formed the basis of Japan's defensive plans. The movement of these troops was delayed by shipping shortages, however.[SUP][4][/SUP] Efforts to reinforce the Marianas and Caroline islands were assigned the highest priority, and the units selected for western New Guinea remained in China until April 1944, when ships became available to transport them.[SUP][5][/SUP]
    By early 1944, Allied submarines were sinking large numbers of Japanese ships. Their activities were frequently guided by 'Ultra' intelligence relating to ship movements which was collected by intercepting and decrypting encoded radio transmissions. The IJN routinely broadcast the location and intended route of convoys under its protection, and decrypting these messages allowed Allied naval commanders to alert submarines in the vicinity of convoys. The submarine commanders were free to plan their interception and attack where conditions were most favorable.[SUP][6]


    [/SUP]
     
    karenlalaniz likes this.
  10. karenlalaniz

    karenlalaniz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    18
    Hmmm...those do help. The timing doesn't line up though. Unfortunately, his intelligence team were often told incorrect information and that is the case with the sub he was on. When the patrols became available on the internet, he looked it up and found that it wasn't anywhere near where he'd been. I have spoken to someone in person who remembers seeing the sub off of Iwo prior to the initial invasion. He said it would surface at night, which is what Dad had said too. And he said it scared them half to death because they couldn't tell if it was their own guys or the enemy. Dad was there about five days prior to the initial invasion. So, this would have taken place from approximately February 14 to maybe a few days after the initial invasion on February 19th. This is verified in his records. His sub did not sink the ships. He passed on a message and I believe he said they were hit by bombing airplanes. The way I understand it, they (the Japanese ships) were quite a ways out still. Oh my...these things drive me crazy! He has just begun having nightmares about this and I'm sure more details will come as he talks about it. What I wish more than anything in the world is that he could somehow forget it all and live his last years in peace. But it doesn't seem that is likely. Sorry for the emotional vent. ~Karen
     
  11. 36thID

    36thID Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,059
    Likes Received:
    202
    Great thread you all. I bet the experts on here solve it.

    Karen, your dad is an example why the Allies won the war. He has my respects. Slipdigit said it best.
     
  12. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    I think we must also face the possibility that the information either provided by your father or given to your father is in error. The fact may be that there was no such damage inflicted on such a convoy. Or that the damge to the convoy was minimal, and the results were "inflated" by the attacking submarines.

    For instance, from the TROM of CD-49 on combinedfleet.com:
    Japanese Escorts
     
  13. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    JANAC records don't show any submarine attacks that resulted in any sinkings in that time frame for that area. So if such an attack did take place, it was likely barge traffic that would not have be counted in the JANAC, thus, only examination of submarine war patrols for that time would yield any clues.

    Still, if as you say "Thousands died." There would have been some mention of it somewhere.
    Thus, I have to say that while it is possible, I doubt that it is probable that such an attack to place.
     
  14. rkline56

    rkline56 USS Oklahoma City CG5

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,194
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    CA Norte Mexico, USA
    Karen,
    I am glad you can begin to formulate an answer for your father's questions.

    I certainly hope, in time, he can breathe easy for compiling a cache of indispensible information that helped shorten the war and saved many Allied and Japanese armed forces personnel's lives, civilians too. His efforts are to be highly commended for a job well done. Just my humble opinion.

    My Grandfather's brother went ashore early on Okinawa as a Seabee to assist with offloading men and material and beach obstacle clearance. He survived the war, possibly because of the intel people like your father provided prior to the invasion.
    Therefore, I want to profusely thank your father for his efforts to complete a vital mission.
     
  15. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,335
    Likes Received:
    5,696
    HyperWar: Japanese Naval and Merchant Shipping Losses [Chapter 4]
     
    LRusso216 likes this.
  16. karenlalaniz

    karenlalaniz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    18
    It looks like the key may be for my father to dig up the article he saw recently in the newspaper about this. At times, he shares things with me verbally but it feels like he doesn't want me digging into it right then. Eventually, he will give me something that is key. I simply have to wait him out.

    I don't doubt my father's memory of events for a second. A military man I met who lives about an hour away was at a meeting I was at and heard Dad's story - the one in our book. He was so nice and supportive and wanted to meet my father. I didn't know at the time, that he wanted to gauge Dad's mental state and memory. Well, after leaving, he said he was blown away by his memory. Anyone who has met and spent time with my father never would question him. I don't know what it is about him, but he's going on 91 and has a better memory than I do - no kidding. He remembers details from way back that most of us would never commit to memory in the first place. I suspect he has a photographic memory as well. He is not your average 90-year old. I'm not saying he's perfect, but if he's unsure of something, he says so.

    To clarify - he was on a submarine that passed the information on. The sub did not do any of the damage to the Japanese ships directly. Dad flipped the switch from "receiving" to "sending" so that the powers-that-be could make a decision on this particular piece of information. He never saw or felt anything. The Japanese ship never got close to the island.

    rkline - Thank you for your words. That means a lot and I will pass it on to my father. When guilt overtakes you, it's easy to lose the big picture. ~Karen
     
  17. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Do you know what the article was? I looked at AP, but couldn't locate one.
     
  18. karenlalaniz

    karenlalaniz Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    18
    He said it was a local article, but he doesn't remember many details except those that I mentioned here. He said he also saw it on some history documentary about six months ago. He said it wasn't the subject of the documentary but was mentioned in it. Oh me. Here we go again. Thank you for looking. I hadn't thought of looking at AP - good idea. My father describes the scene as he and several other guys being there. After he flipped the switch, sending the message to the powers-that-be, they went back to work. A while later, one of his comrades said something like, 'Well, it looks like you and me made a difference today. After we sent that message, our guys sunk or disabled a whole convoy - thousands of Jap[anese]s were killed and didn't make it to Iwo.' Something like that. They all pat each other on the back and had a moment of celebration before going back to their jobs.

    One thing I'm not sure of is that I know the crypto team were moved at some point from a sub to a ship, because the communications room was flooded. I believe that was at Okinawa though. Anyway, thanks for your interest and time. I'll keep working on this as time permits. ~Karen
     
  19. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,130
    Likes Received:
    2,497
    I think this may be it.........But it appears to only add another ?? The actual date isn't given and a quick search hasn't uncovered anything. Opana's hyperwar shows the Yoneyama Maru #1 was sunk just North of Iwo Jima Jan 24,1945, prior to the invasion and another question arises as no mention of two other ships? I'm betting on this being the convoy.

    Northeast of Iwo Jima, the destroyers USS Dunlap (DD-384) and the USS Fanning (DD-385) sank a small Japanese three-ship convoy that had just arrived that morning. The ships sunk were the transport I-Go Yoneyama Maru and the auxiliary minesweepers Keinan Maru and No.7 Showa Maru.

    The search continues.......

    WWII related events occurring on January 24, 1945

    another little snippet;
    http://books.google.com/books?id=rr...8ASNtIWeCA&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=Keinan Maru&f=false
     

Share This Page