Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Italian campaign uses Hannibal's plan...not Montgomery's

Discussion in 'What If - Mediterranean & North Africa' started by curious, Dec 1, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Carl W Schwamberger

    Carl W Schwamberger Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,051
    Likes Received:
    81
    Actually the question has been on discussion boards before. There is onesuch from a year or two ago buried on the Commando Supremo site.

    Comando Supremo: Italy at War :: Index

    I cant recall exactly where the other was. From economic analysis, like that found in Ellis's 'Brute Force' it is clear Italy was not contributing much to the overall Axis war effort by 1942. Between the defeats in Africa & Russia, and the start of Alied heavy bomber attacks on Italys industry/transportation morale on the home front was declining.
     
  2. Seadog

    Seadog Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    11
    Eisenhower was very much a "behind the curtains" type of commander. Many of his more forceful decisions were kept out of the public eye. It was this very lack of wanting the limelight that made him such a good choice for his job. Even when President, he held a reputation of being little more than a figurehead. Yet, under his presidency, many of the most monumental events took place without fuss or muss.

    It took a strong person to handle the numerous egos. Prima donna generals, foolish politicians, and bumbling bureaucrats all had to be made to agree to a central cause. In most cases, it was the challenge of getting all the forces involved to agree to a course of action. But when the time came, it was the solitary task of making the decision that would risk the lives of thousands of brave young men for unknown gains. All of the generals leading the troops, only had to make the plans of how to best achieve their assigned goal. The politicians had to assign timelines for success and gather the infrastructure of equipment and troops. Only one person had the responsibility to say where they hit, what they they hit with, and when did they hit. It is one thing to plan something in the abstract, another to make plans knowing that one little failure could meant thousands of lives.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page