Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Pearl Harbor was a TRAP TO CATCH A (JAPANESE)

Discussion in 'Pearl Harbor Conspiracy Theories' started by dexter livingstone, Jan 7, 2012.

Tags:
  1. Tamino

    Tamino Doc - The Deplorable

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    305
    Location:
    Untersteiermark
    I am not supporting here either side here but I wouldn't trash Dexter's claims so easily either. His story is an interesting one, though. There were substantial interests to drag America into the war; there is no doubt about that. Also, American industry has profited from producing enormous quantities of weapons for allied forces. A motive is there.

    I understand claims that American political system is rather efficient but as long as politicians are involved, everything is possible. You are lucky; we Europeans wouldn't be sure about virtues of politicians. I don’t think that Japanese attack indeed was such a big surprise. A controversy will exist, at least.

    Regards
     
  2. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    An absurd motive Gen. Marshall and Adm. King were begging for all the time FDR could give them to drag the US into a better military posture. To think that they would turn around and allow all that material, and men they had known for years, to be destroyed is beyond bizarre. We wanted to get into the war, the "good guys" were in trouble. And we would have an declaration of war by June, '42 latest, anyway. So the "backdoor to war" idea is just a slander on FDR.
    The only controversy is why people expound on topics without little or no familiarity of the subject matter. Pet peeve of mine.
     
  3. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    Right! Now that you mention it I remember. But there is still the Martin-Bellinger Report that rates a carrier attack as ' the most likely and dangerous form of attack'.
     
  4. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    ...among all those forms of attack that might be made. Neither General Martin nor Admiral Bellinger claimed that they foresaw or predicted a carrier attack on Pearl. In their testimonies they emphasized that the report was a threat estimate and not a psychic manifesto. What they said was that any other means of attack, including an IJN battleline steaming up to Oahu to shell the harbor, was not as likely.
     
  5. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Indeed they did. They also included carrier attacks on the Panama canal and West Coast I beleive. That isn't all that relevant to what they believed the Japanese were capable of however.
    In particular they didn't know about the underway refueling which was critical for the escort vessels.
    That report doesn't susport your arguement. In particular while it address the threat to PH it doesn't address the capability of Japan to do it from a "standing start".
    I don't think this is quite correct. Prior to the out break of the war the two most likely forms of Japanese attacks on Hawaii were taken to be submarine attacks and sabotage. Since Short responded to the latter and Kimmel to the former. It's not clear just how much they worried about it or how much the others you mention worried about it.
     
  6. dexter livingstone

    dexter livingstone recruit

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    The guests came to the table, the Japanese and Nazis and Italians sat on one side. They brought carriers, a surprise, and Toronto. On the other side sat the UK and the US. They brought a prostitute and a beautiful virgin respectively.

    The purpose of the party was to make a pie, Pearl Harbor!
     
  7. Marmat

    Marmat Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    71
    Location:
    Huronia, Upper Canada
    ... Toronto go in the pie dough, or was it a filling??
     
  8. dexter livingstone

    dexter livingstone recruit

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    The UK and the Italians had their asses kicked, so they would tend to be proactive. The Nazis and the US tried to ignore each other, they had a history. So it was the Japanese with the experience of the Italians at Toronto who made the crust of the pie, they would abuse the virgin, Aloha!

    The prostitute would provide sugar to lure the abused virgin into the Europe conflict. The virgin brought the plums of midway, sea planes and more carriers.

    And, finally the Nazis brought icing, but the bag was empty! What could have been in the bag?

    Assumptions of petty emotions of Japanese saving face of impotence and Hitler's ego to be the one to declare war underestimate the enemy. This was a pie of pies, grand tactics were in play, no place for ten year olds. No place for bluffing.


    What could the Nazis have in the bag for icing, that would further drive the raped virgin into further isolationism, which would take the worry off Japan of a Joan of Arc on the warpath in the pacific, and of the Nazis that the US would intervein in Europe?
     
  9. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    I got that info from Gordon Prange's 'Verdict of History'. It says that short was more or less alone in his worries about sabotage. It also quotes Kimmel telling a friend that he never believed the Japanese would attack PH.
     
  10. dexter livingstone

    dexter livingstone recruit

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Off to a party, think on this one! Avoid volume.
     
  11. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    In all 25,000+ pages of testimony during all eight investigations, nobody claimed they anticipated the attack.
     
  12. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Eh?

    "Toronto" is the capital of Ontario. "Taranto", on the other hand, was where the Italian fleet was crippled by a Royal Navy air attack. One has a lot to do with Pearl Harbor. The other has no connection.
     
  13. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    You missed the subtle reference to the War of 1812 there, didn't you?
     
  14. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Dexter is drawing a parallel between Taranto and Pearl Harbor, but refers to it as Toronto in two messages.

    In the War of 1812, Toronto (then called Fort York) was attacked by the Americans and burnt. I don't see what this has to do with Pearl Harbor either. Both were suprise attacks, and that is the only similarity.

    EDIT: Nevermind. Sometimes internet sarcasm is hard to decipher.
     
  15. Marmat

    Marmat Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    71
    Location:
    Huronia, Upper Canada
    ... "Taranto" was a Potawatomi chief, killed at the Battle of Stoney Creek, "Toronto" was something the Japanese put in their pie crust to attract virgins so they could party, no?

    Opana, methinks you've done all this before?
     
  16. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    It was a joke.
     
  17. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    I was given a copy of the Hearings in 1965. I read them all by the time I was 20. I since have been addressing conspiracy theories, some 46 years this Spring. So yeah, I've done this before.
     
  18. Marmat

    Marmat Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    71
    Location:
    Huronia, Upper Canada
  19. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    I used to know of the folks there, back when PearlHarborAttacked.com was buzzing. I dropped off the radar when I was working on my Ph.D.
     
    Marmat likes this.
  20. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,355
    Likes Received:
    5,708
    Doesn't seem very busy over there.
     

Share This Page