Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

vid: hood vs bismarck

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by Quillin, Nov 7, 2007.

  1. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
  2. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    You have to feel Sink the Bismarck would be a great film to remake with modern effects just as long as Hollywood 'revisionism' could kept out.
     
  3. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    but remember that today's public do not want history, they want action, special effects and romance
     
  4. Commando

    Commando recruit

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Messages:
    494
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    I want history!
     
  5. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Well, that film has history, action and romance. And it even got nazis too. Add good special effects and you got a bestseller.
     
  6. Boba Nette

    Boba Nette New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    via TanksinWW2
    I couldn't agree more.That would be an awesome flick.
     
  7. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Indeed. But imagine the shock the audience would get when confronted by a cast that, lo and behold, can ACT! :wink:
     
  8. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    The worst episodes of Dogfights were the ones dealing with naval topics. The CGI works a lot better with aircraft, and the details of a naval engagement are simply too much to ask.
     
  9. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Interestingly written...

    Phrases like "largest warship afloat' and 'most powerful warship afloat' for Bismark (is either of those true?), and an overall slant that shows the British to be simply shooting away without effect while the Germans manage to 'closely miss'. And the fact that PoW actually hit Bismark is not mentioned until litrally the last few seconds.
     
  10. Revere

    Revere New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Iowa, US
    via TanksinWW2
    I thought the Tripitz was bigger and stronger..
     
  11. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    tirpitz was 3 meters longer than bismarck
    tirpitz max displacement was 53,500
    bismarck max displacement was 50,405
    tirpitz had better AA and radar
     
  12. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Slipshod writing and poor research. I find it amazing how often I find so-called "documentaries" with a weak grasp of facts. :roll:
     
  13. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Largest warship afloat: For instance, Yamato was already launched thought not completed nor commissioned but definitely afloat at that time. Most powerful, well, not really. As much I hate to admit it but any of those full sized fleet carriers were more powerful. And some battleships were atleast as powerful as Bismarck.
     
  14. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    The IOWA-class, for example. Or the NORTH CAROLINAs.
     
  15. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    At the point in time being discussed, Iowa had no guns, so she's probably not as powerful. The NCs were not yet operational because of their prolonged post-commission remedial work.
     
  16. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Hood longer than the Bismark (though displaced less)?
     
  17. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Hood was longer and skinnier and about 1000 tons heavier in "standard" condition--which of course was a fiction. The Lexingtons were even longer. So who was most powerful...?
     
  18. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    The answer would likely depend on who you asked.
     
  19. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    Let us look at the armour and compare the guns. Bismarck would probably have better armour and better/modern guns. So, based on those two factors, yes, bismarck was the most powerfull ship during that battle.

    Remake of "Sink the Bismarck" would indeed be nice and we can even give everything that hollywood wants like big explosions, drama as we look at the wounded men on the ships, heroism on board of the ships, a grand finale where the good guys shoot apart the "bad" germans. Hell, we even can fit in a love story at the scenes in naval headquarters. Although i think that holywood wants to combine drama and love together in this style:
    British sailor on the PoW finds out his letter-girlfriend (the love of his life) from germany works on board of the Bismarck. + this scenario even has the famous "Hollywood and history don't go together" thing in it. (there were no women on board of ships)
     
  20. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    Nope the Hollywood version would involve the Battleship Bismark (note Bismark NOT Bismarck, we don't want to confuse and frighten cinema goers with foreign words) on a mission to bombard the San Andreas Fault there by destroying silicon valley. Only one man can save the day: President Roosevelt (played by Russel Crowe) who must destroy Bismark and rescue his daughter.

    The film opens with Roosevelt para dropping onto Bismarks quarter deck. Cutting his way through thousands of Nazis with his trusty six shooter (firing gangster style of course) and pausing only to mutter 'I'm getting too old for this shit' Roosevelt reaches the Battleships bridge, and there finds Adolf Hitler himself (play by Alan Rickman). In a climatic marshal arts fight, Roosevelt and Hitler battle for the fate of the free world.

    With Hitler thrown down the battleships funnel Roosevelt and his daughter dive into a handy lifeboat only seconds before Bismarks nuclear reactor explodes.

    Expect to see BISMARK II, Tirpitz Revenge to reach cinemas summer 2009.
     

Share This Page