Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Which fighter would you want to fly in?

Discussion in 'Aircraft' started by JimboHarrigan2010, Jan 22, 2012.

  1. JimboHarrigan2010

    JimboHarrigan2010 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    4
    Me in my opinion, would go for a Focke-Wulf 190 A, 5 reasons mainly,
    1) It's relatively well protected
    2) It's easy to fly for a novice
    3) It packs a punch
    4) It was fast and manuverable in a dogfight
    5) It looks good
     
  2. Gebirgsjaeger

    Gebirgsjaeger Ace

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    290
    Good choice, but if i had to choose a fighter i would like to take the Northop P-61 Black Widow Nightfighter,

    The aircraft is well constructed, has a radar enough firepower and it was a save fighter. And last but not least it looks cool!
    But the most liked aircraft that i would had flewn is the Henschel HS129 B-2/Wa.
     
  3. belasar

    belasar Court Jester

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,515
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    I too would choose the P-61 but for a different reason. Very safe, few night inturders to come up against.
     
  4. USMCPrice

    USMCPrice Idiot at Large

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    5,168
    Likes Received:
    2,140
    Location:
    God's Country
    F4U Corsair-power, agility, good firepower, good protection, rugged. Last but not least BE-U-T-FULL.
     
    brndirt1 likes this.
  5. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    F4U Corsair for me as well

    4 X .50 Cals
    Rockets
    Bombs
    Radar
    and....

    They were still making them in 1945 can't necessarily say that about the FW-190
     
  6. JimboHarrigan2010

    JimboHarrigan2010 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    4
    ah the whistling death
     
  7. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    9,596
    Likes Received:
    3,086
    FW190 D-9
    Simply the best.
     
  8. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Without doubt the Corsair.
     
  9. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,149
    Likes Received:
    2,509
    The "Jug".
    Eight .50 caliber's,
    High ceiling,
    Armored cockpit,
    Superior diving speed,
    Stable during strafing at low altitudes,
    Rockets, multiple bomb load configurations & capabilities,
    Ugly maybe, but attractive in a rugged way,
    Survivability factor High.
     
  10. muscogeemike

    muscogeemike Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    7
    Since I got to ride in one I would choose the P-38 Lightning.
     
  11. mcoffee

    mcoffee Son-of-a-Gun(ner)

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    435
    My first choice would be the F8F Bearcat. Although it did not fire a shot in anger during the war, VF-19 was embarked aboard Langley with F8F's and headed to the war zone when the Japanese surrendered, so I think it qualifies.

    The F8F was both faster and more manueverable than most of its potential adversaries. It's outstanding rate of climb and accelleration were also bonuses. Arguably the best piston-engined pure dogfighter ever built.
     
  12. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I'd go with the P-47 Thunderbolt (a later model, with the bubble canopy)

    -Durability: Can take a lot of hits and still keep flying (especially useful if someone more agile comes up against me).
    -Firepower: 8 .50s, enough bombs to do some serious damage, and 10 HVAR rockets. Truely a "multi-role" aircraft.
    -Power: R-2800 engine producing 2500 horsepower. Radials were generally more durable than inlines, so I don't have to worry as much about a lone MG round taking out my engine.
    -Speed: While bulky, the P-47 could still hit nearly 700 km/h.
    -Ground attack: There's a lot of trains and convoys to hit, but you're going to need the firepower and durability to do so.

    Not to mention the fact that a US aircraft comes with air superiority, good logisitics and a nice base in southern England to call home.
     
  13. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    The Brewster Model 239. Best claims to losses ratio of any WW2 fighter(32:1), beat the runner up, the F6F merely managed 19:1.
     
  14. muscogeemike

    muscogeemike Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    7
    I thought I was the only westerner who knew of the "Sky Pearl" record!
     
  15. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    9,596
    Likes Received:
    3,086
    I'll see you in the skies at 10...i'll be the one spitting flame at 400MPH.
     
  16. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    I'm sure, well I know the Finns and since when do Finns not count as westerners? Ok, north-westerners. *grin*
    Be warned, there are Me109-G for dealing with German planes, who misbehave in Finnish airspace. ;)
     

Share This Page